Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: QUESTION OF THE DAY - MCQ’S ALL SECTIONS (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
antoine_32
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Posted: 01 Oct 2010 at 09:52 | IP Logged  

AndrewCPA wrote:

Today’s question: REG

Under the Sales Article of the UCC, which of the following statements is correct regarding the warranty of merchantability arising when there has been a sale of goods by a merchant seller?

A)   The warranty arises when the buyer relies on the seller's skill in selecting the goods purchased.

B)   The warranty arises when the buyer relies on the seller's skill in selecting the goods purchased.

C)   The warranty cannot be disclaimed.

D)   The warranty arises as a matter of law when the seller ordinarily sells the goods purchased.

Answer A and B are the same.

Back to Top View antoine_32's Profile Search for other posts by antoine_32
 
cpanet
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2572
Posted: 01 Oct 2010 at 11:23 | IP Logged  

Ah ha...I'm checking on it...

__________________
CPA Exam Club / PLUS / Facebook Study Groups
Back to Top View cpanet's Profile Search for other posts by cpanet Visit cpanet's Homepage
 
AndrewCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 763
Posted: 01 Oct 2010 at 11:35 | IP Logged  

Sorry about that! The original question is now updated and here is the correct answer.

Correct Answer: D

Explanation: 
The warranty of merchantability is implied by law if the seller is a merchant. One who ordinarily sells the product purchased would be a merchant. Since merchantability is an implied warranty, no written or oral words are needed for it to arise. The implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose arises when the buyer relies on seller to select goods, not the warranty of merchantability. Merchantability, like all implied warranties, can be disclaimed.



__________________
Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
Back to Top View AndrewCPA's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewCPA Visit AndrewCPA's Homepage
 
AndrewCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 763
Posted: 01 Oct 2010 at 19:13 | IP Logged  

Today's question: FAR

A company using the composite depreciation method for its fleet of trucks, cars, and campers retired one of its trucks and received cash from a salvage company. The net carrying amount of these composite asset accounts would be decreased by the:

A)   Cash proceeds received and original cost of the truck

B)   Cash proceeds received

C)   Original cost of the truck less the cash proceeds

D)  Original cost of the truck



__________________
Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
Back to Top View AndrewCPA's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewCPA Visit AndrewCPA's Homepage
 
Mars
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 514
Posted: 01 Oct 2010 at 21:32 | IP Logged  

I guess it is D
Back to Top View Mars's Profile Search for other posts by Mars
 




<< Prev Page of 164 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote