Posted: 26 Mar 2009 at 13:28 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Sanjana, not sure how to explain effectively, but this is my understanding :-
According to old pension rules (SFAS 87 and SFAS 106), delayed recognition was permitted for the changes in the funded status of a pension plan due to gains or losses, prior service costs and net transition assets or obligations.
New pension rules, i.e., SFAS 158 eliminated this delayed recognition. And, provided to recognize the above three items in other comprehensive income (which were not recognized/expensed as components of net periodic benefit cost earlier)
Remember, these costs affect the pension benefit liability/asset (amount to be contributed/funded/adjusted to the pension plan)
Thus, the JE:-
Dr OCI
Cr Pension benefit Liability
Now, the subsequent JE(s) which recognizes/expenses a part of these costs for the current period and period going forward.
Dr: Net Periodic Pension Cost
Cr: OCI
The above JE recognizes a part of the unrecognized costs per period as expense as per the SIR-AGE rules. Thus, we take out the current period's portion out of OCI and take it to income statement for the current period as NPPC. Full amount is not taken out in one year !
Now, the above JE would be consistent for "AGE" (all prior period items now expensed annually)
If we have to recognize "SIR" (Service cost, Interest expense and Expected Return) for the current period :-
DR NPPC
CR Pension Benefit Liability
Becker has an excellent example - pages F6-14 to F6-17. It covers all the JEs !
Hope it helped !
__________________ Divya - CO State
Passed using Becker Review :
FAR - 04/11/09 - 94
BEC - 05/30/09 - 86
REG - 08/29/09 - 95
AUD - 11/21/09 - 92
Ethics - 2011
|