Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Change in Principle (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
CPA08va
Regular
Regular


Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Posted: 22 Aug 2009 at 11:14 | IP Logged  

Need somehelp clarifying the rules on this.  It's my understanding that changes in acct principle are now handled retrospectively, i.e. prior period financial statements are updated to reflect the new principle. 

 1) Can someone help clarify how this is different from restating the financial statements (which is done for a change in entity). 

2) Also, I thought that when retrospective application is not possible, then the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle could be applied (says so in Wiley).  However, Wiley 2009 MC#7 (module 7c) contradicts this theory.

3) Finally, Becker has certain exxceptions, e.g. change to LIFO that is handled as a change in estimate - is that still true - I did not see that in the Yaeger handouts.

Thanks

Back to Top View CPA08va's Profile Search for other posts by CPA08va
 
optimistCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 360
Posted: 22 Aug 2009 at 12:46 | IP Logged  

According to me,

1. Restating the F/S is same as retrospective application.
2. When retrospective application is not possible, change
is treated prospectively i.e like change in estimate.
3. Change to LIFO and change in dep. method are both
changes in accounting principles but cannot be restated and
thus are treated like change in estimate i.e.
prospectively.

Hope this helps and are correct. If not I am sure someone
will correct it.

__________________
BEC--80
REG--95
FAR--77
AUD--82
Back to Top View optimistCPA's Profile Search for other posts by optimistCPA
 
Zeratul
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 987
Posted: 22 Aug 2009 at 13:26 | IP Logged  

optimistCPA wrote:

3. Change to LIFO and change in dep. method are both
changes in accounting principles but cannot be restated and
thus are treated like change in estimate i.e.
prospectively.

Hope this helps and are correct. If not I am sure someone
will correct it.

Change in depreciation method is considered to be (in Wiley's words) "a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in principle." The treatment of this category is to apply it prospectively (e.g. no cumulative effect and no restatement).
Change to LIFO, if I am not mistaken, is one of those accounting changes which tends to meet one of the three tests for forgoing the cumulative effect estimation/retrospective application (from Wiley):

1. After making every reasonable effort to apply the new principle to the previous period, the entity is unable to do so.
2. Retrospective application requires assumptions about management's intentions in a prior period that cannot be independently substantiated.
3. Retrospective application requires a significant estimates, and it is impossible to obtain objective information about the estimates.

Conversion to LIFO tends to fail the third test. Therefore conversion to LIFO is generally treated prospectively.

Hope that helps!
Back to Top View Zeratul's Profile Search for other posts by Zeratul
 
CPA08va
Regular
Regular


Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Posted: 22 Aug 2009 at 13:59 | IP Logged  

Thanks Optimistcpa and zeratul.  Can either of you help clarify my question #2 above.  I don't understand why the answer is D = 0 for that question.
Back to Top View CPA08va's Profile Search for other posts by CPA08va
 
Zeratul
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 987
Posted: 23 Aug 2009 at 16:52 | IP Logged  

CPA08VA, The question asks what amount should be reported as gain/loss on cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle. According to SFAS 154, the cumulative effect of the change of accounting principle is directly applied to the relevant assets/liabilities and offset to retained earnings. There is NO gain/loss recognition as a result of an accounting change.
Back to Top View Zeratul's Profile Search for other posts by Zeratul
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1250 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote