Posted: 22 Aug 2009 at 11:14 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Need somehelp clarifying the rules on this. It's my understanding that changes in acct principle are now handled retrospectively, i.e. prior period financial statements are updated to reflect the new principle.
1) Can someone help clarify how this is different from restating the financial statements (which is done for a change in entity).
2) Also, I thought that when retrospective application is not possible, then the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle could be applied (says so in Wiley). However, Wiley 2009 MC#7 (module 7c) contradicts this theory.
3) Finally, Becker has certain exxceptions, e.g. change to LIFO that is handled as a change in estimate - is that still true - I did not see that in the Yaeger handouts.
Thanks
|