Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: EPS (becker) (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
gacpa1234
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Posted: 30 Jun 2008 at 00:58 | IP Logged  

The question says that the preferred stock are cumulative, which means that dividends are owed to the shareholders every year, and if not paid, must be carried forward as a dividends in arrears balance. Since no dividends were paid in 19X3, the first $10,000 of the $16,000 dividends paid in 19X4 are technically making up for the dividends in arrears from 19X3 (25,000 shares x $10 per share x 4% cumulative dividend). The remaining $6,000 paid goes toward the preferred dividend for this year, and $4,000 dividend in arrears balance is carried forward to the next year.

When you calculate EPS, you subtract the cumulative preferred dividend as if if was paid, even if it was not. Each year, this company in essence incurs a $10,000 dividend liability for the preferred shareholders because the stock is cumulative. When the EPS was calculated for 19X3, $10,000 would have been subtracted from the numerator even though the dividends were not actually paid until the following year. That's why in 19X4 you only subtract $10,000, even though $16,000 was actually paid.

Hope that helps.
Back to Top View gacpa1234's Profile Search for other posts by gacpa1234
 
Would be CPA
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 48
Posted: 30 Jun 2008 at 12:37 | IP Logged  

The concept here is very simple....Cash and Accrual.The $ 10,000 is the expense for the year and therefore deducted from the income to calculate EPS. Whereas $ 16,000 is the amount paid (Cash) has nothing to do with exp as it will apprear on the Cash flow statement, therefore not considered in the calculation.

Hope it will help to clarify.



__________________
Would Be CPA
BEC-81
FAR-79
REG-Feb 17-09 rcvd Mar 24-09, 70
AUD-May 2009
Back to Top View Would be CPA's Profile Search for other posts by Would be CPA
 
neott
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
Posted: 25 Mar 2009 at 03:13 | IP Logged  

Thank you guys, nice and clear explanations. 
Back to Top View neott's Profile Search for other posts by neott
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


<< Prev Page of 2
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote