Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: FAR - Wiley Students (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
joecjr
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 974
Posted: 24 Oct 2009 at 10:08 | IP Logged  

I just watched yaeger portion of deferred taxes to help us both with this distinguishment.

Since the question states there are no deferred income taxes for any year then the only income tax expense you can have is current income tax expense which is your Total income tax expense for 2008.

Total income tax expense= current tax expense plus deferre portion.  Since question states no taxes were deferred we can only have current income tax expense.

your calculation is correct based on the question I just watched on the video. $240,000= $800,000 x .30



__________________
FAR [83] 1109 Yaeger
AUD [90] 0510 Roger CPA
BEC [76] 0810 Yaeger/Gleim
REG [80] 1110 Yaeger
Done 12/16/2010
1year & 4months

Philadelphia, PA
joey_cjr@yahoo.com
Back to Top View joecjr's Profile Search for other posts by joecjr
 
soontobecpa
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 03 May 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 732
Posted: 24 Oct 2009 at 10:32 | IP Logged  

Thank you,Joecjr.

Yes,I didnt pay attention to that.Becker has the similar
question where it says"no def taxes" but still they take
120,000 into account.

Well,I guess Wiley is right then.

If they had not mentioned anything about def taxes,the ans
would have been 360,000,right?

Thanks again :)

__________________
Done.Thank God.
Back to Top View soontobecpa's Profile Search for other posts by soontobecpa
 
joecjr
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 974
Posted: 24 Oct 2009 at 10:38 | IP Logged  

yes because the 120,000 that had been deferred would be part of Total Income tax expense= current + deferred.

so 240+ 120= 360.

Phil Yaeger tied down this deferred tax module very well if you have access to it. I never understood it well before he taught it and Becker was confusing as *&^$



__________________
FAR [83] 1109 Yaeger
AUD [90] 0510 Roger CPA
BEC [76] 0810 Yaeger/Gleim
REG [80] 1110 Yaeger
Done 12/16/2010
1year & 4months

Philadelphia, PA
joey_cjr@yahoo.com
Back to Top View joecjr's Profile Search for other posts by joecjr
 
soontobecpa
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 03 May 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 732
Posted: 24 Oct 2009 at 10:43 | IP Logged  

Thanks!! Got it.



__________________
Done.Thank God.
Back to Top View soontobecpa's Profile Search for other posts by soontobecpa
 
capricorn
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Posted: 30 Oct 2009 at 20:52 | IP Logged  

rrajan wrote:

I agree with Joykil. Wiley MCQ are tricky questions. It
makes you to understand the concepts including "between the
lines" So it is opportunity to understand the concepts
better
Back to Top View capricorn's Profile Search for other posts by capricorn
 




<< Prev Page of 12 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote