Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Govt accounting, (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
ngbrian85
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 57
Posted: 14 Aug 2010 at 11:56 | IP Logged  

anyone ?

__________________
AUD - 87 - Jan23/10
BEC - 76 - Feb20/10
REG - 80 - May26/10
FAR - 81 - Aug27/10
Back to Top View ngbrian85's Profile Search for other posts by ngbrian85
 
divyagovil1
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 16 Aug 2010 at 01:15 | IP Logged  

I recall this very clearly as it took me time to understand the concept of modified accrual basis of accounting and how to record the revenues in Governmental accounting.

Governmental funds focus primarily on the sources, uses and balance of current financial resources and often have a budgetary orientation. They employ the flow of current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting.

    • Revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become measurable and available.
    • Expenditures are recognized when incurred, if measurable

Your question seems logical that why 610,000 as a debit to property tax receivable and not 600,000 and $590,000 as revenues...

Not sure how to explain it in a more clear manner but let me try again:

Given, Total levy    $700,000 (that is, expected to be received on basis of invoices generated)

Next, what is collected and what is expected to be collected during first 60 days of next year? 500,000 + 100,000 = $600,000

Emphasis is on word “Collected” – something received or to be received in cash/bank from customer. (that is, net of allowance for uncollectible)

Thus, $600,000 is straight forward recorded as revenue on the basis of rule as above.

And, since even uncollectible amount can be estimated, even it would be provided for in CY. This is “apart” from what is collected/expected to be collected.

Thus, JE:

DR Property Taxes Receivable -- current      610,000

CR       Revenues          600,000

CR       Allowance for uncollectible accounts      10,000

Rest $90,000 remaining out of total levy would be recorded as revenue in next year.

Hope that helps to clear the confusion ! 



__________________
Divya - CO State

Passed using Becker Review :
FAR - 04/11/09 - 94
BEC - 05/30/09 - 86
REG - 08/29/09 - 95
AUD - 11/21/09 - 92
Ethics - 2011
Back to Top View divyagovil1's Profile Search for other posts by divyagovil1 Visit divyagovil1's Homepage
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


<< Prev Page of 2
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote