Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: dilutive and anti dilutive (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Jams
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 547
Posted: 03 Apr 2009 at 23:44 | IP Logged  

the rule says if calculation of EPS considering convertible stock is above basic EPS you ignore it, since it is anti-diltutive. why is it so ?? no one mentions the reason as to why we ignore it. 

__________________
jams

BEC-76
AUD-80
REG-84
FAR-81 !!!
Back to Top View Jams's Profile Search for other posts by Jams
 
jrupa
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 444
Posted: 04 Apr 2009 at 09:10 | IP Logged  

diltion brings ur eps down.. soo if u see that the eps is more than the basic eps, if we convert the shares thats is y it is ignored ...

i hope it helps ..

Back to Top View jrupa's Profile Search for other posts by jrupa
 
divyagovil1
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 04 Apr 2009 at 09:37 | IP Logged  

take it in a way of conservative approach by the company to only report the diluted EPS for those securities which make the basic EPS go down for a company. (probable loss in ownership for the shareholders)

Remember, Dilution effectively increases the number of shares over which the company’s earnings would be spread if all potentially dilutive securities were exercised. In a way, it reduces a shareholder's stock price below the initial purchase price.

Thus, any loss which a shareholder may incurr in ownership due to the assumed conversion needs to be disclosed in the FS.....

On the other hand, anti-dilution makes EPS go up.... Again, think from a conservative approach. Any probable gains not to be reported until earned !

Hope that helps! Anyone with a different view?

 



__________________
Divya - CO State

Passed using Becker Review :
FAR - 04/11/09 - 94
BEC - 05/30/09 - 86
REG - 08/29/09 - 95
AUD - 11/21/09 - 92
Ethics - 2011
Back to Top View divyagovil1's Profile Search for other posts by divyagovil1 Visit divyagovil1's Homepage
 
Jams
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 547
Posted: 04 Apr 2009 at 11:45 | IP Logged  

wow..thank you rupa and divya, very nice explanation, i wish becker had given this kind of explanation as well. the books just says this the rule, but why is this rule, no one talks about it. thank you both, i really appreciate the effort. 

__________________
jams

BEC-76
AUD-80
REG-84
FAR-81 !!!
Back to Top View Jams's Profile Search for other posts by Jams
 
Jams
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 547
Posted: 04 Apr 2009 at 11:46 | IP Logged  

divya,
your explanations are amazing in any post, have you thought of running any classes after the CPA, i bet you will earn a lot..!


__________________
jams

BEC-76
AUD-80
REG-84
FAR-81 !!!
Back to Top View Jams's Profile Search for other posts by Jams
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote