Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
REG STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : REG STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Alimony payments (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
arushi_13
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1235
Posted: 13 Jul 2009 at 21:22 | IP Logged  

Thanks Nan for checking. Appreciate your help.

Thanks again.


__________________
CA Board
FARE -87
AUD - 87
BEC - 81
REG - 84
ALL DONE !!!

Arushi
Back to Top View arushi_13's Profile Search for other posts by arushi_13
 
kj_nyc
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1145
Posted: 13 Jul 2009 at 22:49 | IP Logged  

I got curious and looked it up in RIA Checkpoint and yes, the estate of a deceased payor ex-spouse can continue to make deductible alimony payments to a surviving recipient ex-spouse if that obligation is written into the divorce decree or other agreement.  The value of the alimony obligation is deducted as a claim against the estate on Form 706 Schedule K.  See below:

Under IRC Sec. 2053, indebtedness or claims that are founded on a “promise or agreement” are deductible only to the extent they were contracted in a bona fide transaction for adequate and full consideration. A transfer of property in satisfaction of spousal marital rights (rights conferred on a surviving spouse by local law upon the death of his or her spouse) is deemed to be made for full and adequate consideration if [IRC Secs. 2043(b)(2) and 2516]:

1. the continued payments are pursuant to a qualifying written agreement under IRC Sec. 2516 as to the parties’ marital and property rights;

2. a final decree of divorce occurs within the three-year period beginning one year before and ending two years after the agreement is entered into; and

3. the property transfer is made to settle marital property rights or to provide a reasonable allowance for the support of the parties’ minor children.

Thus, the continued payment of alimony and child support obligations (or a transfer of property in satisfaction of the obligation) by the decedent’s estate, pursuant to an agreement meeting the above requirements, is deductible as a claim against the estate. The agreement need not be approved by a court so long as the obligation is valid under applicable local law.

Valuing an Alimony Obligation

The valuation of an estate’s obligation to continue payment of alimony after the decedent’s death is determined actuarially based on the life expectancy of the decedent’s spouse. The payments should be valued using the tables issued under IRC Sec. 7520 and a rate equal to 120% of the federal midterm rate (rounded to the nearest .2%) in effect for the month in which the valuation date falls.

Example 13C-2: Valuation of the estate’s obligation to pay alimony.

At the time of Will Brodsky’s death, he was obligated to pay his former wife, Julie, $1,250 per month for the remainder of her life. The obligation to make the payment was pursuant to an agreement entered into one month prior to their divorce and was in exchange for Julie’s relinquishment of her marital property rights. Julie was 64 years and 7 months old at the date of Will’s death and will continue to receive the payments on the first of each month. Using the four-step process for valuing annuities for life, and a Section 7520 rate of 7.4%, the value of the estate’s obligation to pay Julie $1,250 per month for life would be $135,215. Accordingly, the estate would be entitled to deduct this amount as a claim against the estate on Schedule K.

Back to Top View kj_nyc's Profile Search for other posts by kj_nyc Visit kj_nyc's Homepage
 
Aznanalyst83
Regular
Regular


Joined: 10 May 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 241
Posted: 14 Jul 2009 at 00:01 | IP Logged  

That is just wrong in certain ways.

I really don't want to get married now -_-


__________________
B-87
R-73,73,80
A-71,78
F-?
Hopefully with a job in public...
Back to Top View Aznanalyst83's Profile Search for other posts by Aznanalyst83
 
divyagovil1
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 15 Jul 2009 at 22:17 | IP Logged  

I wonder what is to be read from cpaexam point of view? :(

__________________
Divya - CO State

Passed using Becker Review :
FAR - 04/11/09 - 94
BEC - 05/30/09 - 86
REG - 08/29/09 - 95
AUD - 11/21/09 - 92
Ethics - 2011
Back to Top View divyagovil1's Profile Search for other posts by divyagovil1 Visit divyagovil1's Homepage
 
Zeratul
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 987
Posted: 17 Jul 2009 at 10:39 | IP Logged  

Aznanalyst83 wrote:
That is just wrong in certain ways.

I really don't want to get married now -_-

I don't want to get too political on these forums, but a combination of laws which are generally overwhelmingly friendly to non-working spouses (still mostly female) and a predominance of man-bad-woman-good (feminist indoctrination) judges make marriage something of a foolhardy institution in this day and age.

Back to Top View Zeratul's Profile Search for other posts by Zeratul
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


<< Prev Page of 2
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote