Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
CPA Review Programs & Study Materials
 CPAnet Forum : CPA Review Programs & Study Materials
Subject Topic: Study Materials (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
ATC2009
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Posted: 06 Sep 2009 at 09:06 | IP Logged  

I agree. I am about half way through the material for FAR and I am around 50%. I know this will not be good enough. I think I am going to go ahead and order Yaeger (FAR). Like you said, you need to understand the material and calculations. Hopefully the classroom setting will help me.
Back to Top View ATC2009's Profile Search for other posts by ATC2009
 
Jerry
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 326
Posted: 06 Sep 2009 at 13:30 | IP Logged  

ATC2009 wrote:
I agree. I am about half way through the material for FAR and I am around 50%. I know this will not be good enough. I think I am going to go ahead and order Yaeger (FAR). Like you said, you need to understand the material and calculations. Hopefully the classroom setting will help me.

Good choice!  Additionally, Yaeger is the only review course where you can talk to the instructors if you have a problem.  I talk to Dr. Yaeger over the phone and he has been a big help to me! 

You will not get to talk over the phone to Dr. Gleim or to anyone who knows anything about FAR at Gleim.  The same is true for Becker and Roger.  The best that Gleim can do is to give a stock answer to a particular quesion by e-mail, IF you have Gleim online.  That is better than Becker who does not answer any questions on FAR. 

Back to Top View Jerry's Profile Search for other posts by Jerry
 
bryris
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 624
Posted: 06 Sep 2009 at 22:48 | IP Logged  

I'll never discount anyone's study methods - what works for you, works for you.

That being said, one could argue that Gleim is more like the real world. In the real world, you won't always have someone standing over your shoulder to explain things when you get confused. Being able to look at a set of facts (in Gleim, you get stock answer solutions that are very good, IMHO) and play detective to figure it out does strengthen the ability to be self sustaining. Employers are looking for this skill as well and if you ever run your own business in accounting, you'll be by yourself with a pile of problems and will have to navigate your way through them without calling Dr. Whoever.

Often, I'll get backed into a corner on a topic, but after answering enough questions, cross referencing one explanation off another, drawing pictures and diagrams of the concepts, etc it'll usually click.

For custom explanations, this board works very well - though not all questions are answered.




__________________
REG - 97
FAR - 97
BEC - 90
AUD - 97
Back to Top View bryris's Profile Search for other posts by bryris Visit bryris's Homepage
 
Jerry
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 326
Posted: 07 Sep 2009 at 09:53 | IP Logged  

Professors are usually not educators.  Many professors do not know how to manage a classroom.  Ask high school teachers what they do for a living, and they will tell you that they are educators.  They have taken formal courses on how to teach.  Ask a professor what he does for a living, and he will say that he is a chemist, engineer, CPA etc.  He identifies with his profession, not education.  One professor told me that he only received one lesson in education.  His department head gave him a piece of chalk and told him to write big! 

 

One part of classroom management is not allowing students to ask redundant questions.  I usually tell students who ask frivolous questions that we have a lot of material to cover today; however, I would be happy to answer their questions after class.  As a salesman I went off on many tangents with customers and there were always many distractions during my sales presentations.  I loved the diversions, and I became friends with most of my customers.  However, I always knew where I left off in my sales presentations, and I could return to that point without skipping a beat.  It is one of the reasons that I became one of the top wholesale salespeople in the United States.   

Back to Top View Jerry's Profile Search for other posts by Jerry
 
Jerry
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 326
Posted: 07 Sep 2009 at 10:30 | IP Logged  

bryris wrote:
I'll never discount anyone's study methods - what works for you, works for you.

That being said, one could argue that Gleim is more like the real world. In the real world, you won't always have someone standing over your shoulder to explain things when you get confused. Being able to look at a set of facts (in Gleim, you get stock answer solutions that are very good, IMHO) and play detective to figure it out does strengthen the ability to be self sustaining. Employers are looking for this skill as well and if you ever run your own business in accounting, you'll be by yourself with a pile of problems and will have to navigate your way through them without calling Dr. Whoever.

Often, I'll get backed into a corner on a topic, but after answering enough questions, cross referencing one explanation off another, drawing pictures and diagrams of the concepts, etc it'll usually click.

For custom explanations, this board works very well - though not all questions are answered.


As an entrepreneur and CEO of 45 employees, I valued employees who could solve their own business problems.  When they asked me a question, I never directly answered the question.  I got them to answer their own question.  I had no use for rules-oriented employees.  I told them that the government was looking for rules-oriented people!  I needed employees who were principles-oriented and objective-oriented, not rules oriented.  I needed employees who could think!   

Back to Top View Jerry's Profile Search for other posts by Jerry
 




<< Prev Page of 4 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1250 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote