Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Weighted Average of C/S Outstanding (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
ael719
Regular
Regular


Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 125
Posted: 06 Mar 2010 at 16:42 | IP Logged  

cpa_guy wrote:
(40,000 + 4800*) x 12/12 = 44,800

-4000 x 9/12 = -3000

12000 x 6/12 = 6000

44,800 - 3000 + 6000 = 47,800

* The 10% stock dividend are treated as outstanding for the whole year; therefore 12/12 fraction is used.



The 10% stock dividend was on October 1 when there were 48,000 (48,000 + 4,800) shares outstanding.

Adding the 4,800 stock dividend to the beginning of the year is incorrect for the purpose of weighted average.  Adding the 4,800 stock dividend at the beginning of the year would means that there was a 12% (44,800 / 40,000) stock dividend at the beginning of the year.  It throws off the weighted average by 800 shares for 6 months when those shares did not exist.  The 800 shares were created by the 12,000 new shares issued on 6/30 minus the 4000 treasury stock purchase on 4/1.  To apply the stock dividend retrospectively we have to use the 10% rate.

We fail to apply the retrospective application by ignoring the 1.1 (1 + 10%) factor on all prior transactions from the stock dividend date.   Retrospective application of the stock dividend means there were 10% more shares from 1/1 - 3/31, 10% less shares from 4/1 - 6/30, and 10% more shares from 7/1 - 12/31.

If you want to use that calculation then you have to apply it correctly to the beginning of the year at 10% and for the transactions prior to the stock dividend.

(40,000 x  1.1*) x 12/12 = 44,000

-4000 x 9/12 x 1.1**= -3300

12000 x 6/12 x 1.1***= 6600

44,000 - 3300 + 6600 = 47,300 or,

more evidently seen using this calculation:

1.1(40,000 - 3,000 + 6,000) = 47,300

* The 10% stock dividend are treated as outstanding for the whole year; therefore 12/12 fraction is used.  The 1.1 represents the 10% stock dividend applied retrospectively to the outstanding shares at the beginning of the year.

** The 10% stock dividend are treated as outstanding for the whole year.  The factor 1.1 (1 + 10%) is used to find the weighted average shares outstanding for the 9 months when the outstanding Treasury Stock was purchased back.

*** The 10% stock dividend are treated as outstanding for the whole year; therefore 6/12 fraction is used to find the weighted average shares outstanding for the 6 months when the 12,000 new shares were issued.

Basically, since there were treasury shares purchases and new stock issued during the period prior to the stock dividend, the portion of the dividend attributed to the reduction in stock and addition in new shares is assumed to have occurred on the date t-stock was purchased and the new shares were sold.

I also updated the google docs link to show how the outstanding shares are affected from each transaction. 
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Atfxefm9DKu4dE85a2Q2 QnlRRmZJc05oeUl3WEdxYWc&hl=en

I hope that helps!

Back to Top View ael719's Profile Search for other posts by ael719
 
MARBNYC
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 76
Posted: 06 Mar 2010 at 19:42 | IP Logged  

ael719 wrote:

Adding the 4,800 stock dividend at the beginning of the year would means that there was a 12% (44,800 / 40,000) stock dividend at the beginning of the year.  It throws off the weighted average by 800 shares for 6 months when those shares did not exist.  The 800 shares were created by the 12,000 new shares issued on 6/30 minus the 4000 treasury stock purchase on 4/1.  To apply the stock dividend retrospectively we have to use the 10% rate.

In your most recent chart the retrospective treatment of the stock dividend is applied to each event as a percentage rate. I, on the other hand, had applied the stock dividend as an amount and only to the beginning balance of c/s. More specifically, I added 10% of the c/s outstanding at 10/1 (tot. of 4,800 shares). I left the following events of 4/1 and 6/30 alone because I had already included the amount of the 10% stock dividend to the beginning balance and carrying it forward would only offset the weighted average for double counting or so I thought...I can recognize your answer to be the right one because you can show the 10% applied evenly to each event during the year, whereas mine shows only a 12% adjustment to 1/1, not even at all, right? 

Just to add a little bit more to this topic, what if intead of a stock split at 10/1, there was a 2:1 stock split on the same date?

thanks for such detailed explanation :)



__________________
Marlene
Back to Top View MARBNYC's Profile Search for other posts by MARBNYC
 
ael719
Regular
Regular


Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 125
Posted: 06 Mar 2010 at 20:22 | IP Logged  

np, half way through I got confused and wasn't even sure if I was making sense to myself.

If it were a 2:1 stock split on the same date, everything would be the same except change the 1.1 factor to 2.

2(40,000 - 3,000 + 6,000) = 86,000



Another example: If there were a stock issue of 10,000 shares on 12/1 (after the stock split), what would be the new weighted average?

2(40,000 - 3,000 + 6,000) + (12,000 x 1/12) = 87,000
Back to Top View ael719's Profile Search for other posts by ael719
 
MARBNYC
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 76
Posted: 08 Mar 2010 at 13:43 | IP Logged  

haha, i know the feeling ... you get so far into the topic and then suddenly go blank because you looked at it over and over again that the thought of finding a different way to get the same answer starts unraveling before you...that's when i know i gotta close the book or laptop and give it a rest...

...(a couple of hours later) I struggled a little breaking down the 12,000 additional shares into the weighted average format I use, and here's why:

Date.... shares....div/split.......Period....Wgt. Avg.

1/1.......40,000...........x2*..........3/12.......20,000

4/1.......36,000...........x2*..........3/12.......18,000

6/30......48,000..........x2*..........5/12........40,000

10/1.....*stock split applied retroactively*........-0-

12/1.....108,000 (note below)......1/12..........9,000

......................................................Tot.87,000

 

Note: the number of shares did not jump from 48,000 to 108,000. The stock split caused the number of shares to double up throughout the year. Therefore, at 10/1 (last transaction recorded prior to the 12,000 shares issued at 12/1) there was a total of 96,000 shares (48,000 X 2). And at 12/1 12,000 new shares are added to the 96,000 shares already outstanding, equaling a grand total of 108,000 shares. So if we can just forget about the weighted average and simply compute the number of shares at the different points in time for that year then, at 1/1 there was a total number of 80,000 shares. At 4/1 there was a total of 72,000 shares (80,000 - 8000, not 4000, bc it doubled to to the split). And at 6/30 there were a total of 94000 shares (72,000 + 24000, not 12,000 bc it was doubled). Finally, at 12/1 an additional 12,000 shares are added to 96,000. Why not doubled? it is not doubled because the split was applied only to the transactions prior to 10/1, and that is bc splits are treated retroactively, so it does not apply to the 12,000 additional shares issued on 12/1.

Now, that's what it took for me to see the bigger picture. Now, for purpose of taking the exam I will most certainly use your aproach:

ael719 wrote:
2(40,000 - 3,000 + 6,000) + (12,000 x 1/12) = 87,000

for sure waaaay easier and less time consuming than mine right? :)



__________________
Marlene
Back to Top View MARBNYC's Profile Search for other posts by MARBNYC
 
MARBNYC
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 76
Posted: 08 Mar 2010 at 16:10 | IP Logged  

with regards to stock dividends, i was just doing a mcq and wanted to be clear as to what stock dividends do to total stock holder's equity.  When a stock dividend is declared (large or small) we are turning a given amount of Retained Earnings into Common Stock, is that right? and the main difference between a cash dividend and a stock dividend would then be that a cash dividend is obviously cash the stock holders receive at some point, whereas the stock dividend are new shares of c/s issued to the stock holders...that's where i'm a bit confussed because according to the question total stock holders' equity does not change. As I'm typing this a realized I read the question incorrectly. I assumed total stock holders' equity had to increase bc c/s increased too, I did not consider stock holders equity is also made of RE and APIC. So the amount of RE reclassified as common stock cancels out and there is no change in S.H.E... here's the question:

How would the declaration of a 15% stock dividend affect each of the following:

....Retained Earnings (RE)..........Tot. Stock Hold. Equity

a).......No Effect...........................No Effect

b).......No Effect...........................Decrease

c).......Decrease...........................No Effect

d).......Decrease...........................Decrease

Answer: (c)

Decrease to retained earnings - no effect on shareholder's equity
Rule: A stock dividend (less than 20-25% of stock outstanding) is treated by transferring the FMV of the stock dividend at declaration date from retained earnings to capital stock and paid-in capital.  There is no effect on total shareholder's equity because all transfers take place within shareholder's equity.

To illustrate say,

Total Stock Holders Equity in the Bal. Sheet at 12/31 the prior year showed:

RE...................$20,000

c/s($1 par).......$10,000

APIC................$5,000

TOTAL.............$35,000

 

At the date the 15% stock dividend was declared on the current year (let's also assume the fair value of the c/s was $2 per share only bc for a small stock dividends we are allowed to book it at the fair value) then journal entry would be:

(dr) RE......... $3,000

....(cr)c/s................$1,500

....(cd) APIC.............$1,500

After reclassifying some RE into c/s (or like on prof. Levine used to say, putting money from one pocket into the other) you can see there was NO CHANGE in the TOTAL BALANCE of Stock Holders Equity, see bolow

Total Stock Holders Equity in the Bal. Sheet at 12/31 of the current year would show:

RE...................$17,000

c/s($1 par).......$11,500

APIC................$6,500

TOTAL.............$35,000 (No Change, same bal. as last year)

Now, if it was a large stock dividend, that is >20-25% (rule), and say 30% for this example. Then the JE would be:

(dr) RE......... $6,000

....(cr)c/s................$6,000

We do not record it a fair value, large stock dividends are only recorded at par. Becker pg F7-20 shows 2 entries:

(1) (dr)RE............................$6,000

.........(cr) distributable c/s.................$6,000

(2) (dr) distributable c/s..........$6,000

.........(cr) common stock...................$6,000

I only did one because in the end common stock will be credited. If someone could give some info on why is it crucial that we (cr) dist. c/s first, please share

Finally, the Bal. Sheet would show:

RE...................$14,000

c/s($1 par).......$16,000

APIC................$5,000

TOTAL.............$35,000 (Still No Change, same bal. as last year)

okay! 1 down 999 questions to go :)

 



__________________
Marlene
Back to Top View MARBNYC's Profile Search for other posts by MARBNYC
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


<< Prev Page of 3
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote