Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
MBA / CIA / CFA / CMA
 CPAnet Forum : MBA / CIA / CFA / CMA
Subject Topic: CPA vs CFA (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
fcascfacpa
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Posted: 26 May 2011 at 16:16 | IP Logged  

Greenman72 wrote:

I know a person who is both a CPA and CFA.  These are his words. 

"I studied about 300 hours for each level of the CFA.  I probably studied a total of 300 hours for the CPA exam."



I am an FCAS, a CFA charterholder and a CPA, and I agree with those comments, at least in terms of the relative scale.

I studied, on average, about 300 hours for each actuarial exam.  There were 10 of them when I did it.

I studied about 150-200 hours for each CFA exam.  There is a huge difference between CFA Level I and CFA Level III -- the exams get MUCH harder as you progress.

I studied about 50 hours per CPA exam, and scored a cumulative 388, so there is no question that the CFA exams are harder than the CPA exams.  I would go so far as to say that accounting is tested harder on the CFA exams than on the CPA exam, or at least in more detail.

But the hardest professional exam of all is clearly the PGA's PAT (Playing Ability Test) -- this is a credential for people who want to be golf pros (teachers, not players).  You have to shoot 150 or less for two rounds combined, and pass a written exam as well.  Since occasionally breaking 100 is about the best I can do, that one is well out of reach!
Back to Top View fcascfacpa's Profile Search for other posts by fcascfacpa
 
sshuang
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 28 Apr 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 34
Posted: 26 May 2011 at 16:42 | IP Logged  

Hi fcascfacpa,

What kind of work do you do that requires FCAS, CFA, and CPA?  I am a CPA, thinking of taking either the actuarial or CFA exams.  However, I don't know if it's worth the time and effort.

sshuang

Back to Top View sshuang's Profile Search for other posts by sshuang
 
fcascfacpa
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Posted: 27 May 2011 at 10:21 | IP Logged  

I am an actuary for a property/casualty insurance company, but as I've moved up the ranks, I've gotten more involved in other financial areas, primarily mergers and acquisitions.

The CFA has helped me immensely in that area.  I did the CPA because I want to become a CFO, and there is a bias in my organization that the CFO has to be a CPA.  I disagree, but since the people who make the decision feel that way, I got my CPA.

Unless you want to change careers and become an actuary, there is little value to the actuarial exams.  There is not much crossover to other functional areas.  But the CFA could be very valuable to a lot of career paths.
Back to Top View fcascfacpa's Profile Search for other posts by fcascfacpa
 
CPA@23
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 42
Posted: 24 Jun 2011 at 04:39 | IP Logged  

I guess it all depends on what you want to do: CPA is an essential credential to have if you want to be in public accounting. In the US, you cannot sign an audit report if you are not a CPA.

CFA, on the other hand, is supposed to the most sophisticated user of financial information. It can be beneficial credential to have if you want to go in invetment management, or in other areas of finance.

The relative difficulty of the CPA or the CFA exam can depend on your background. I believe that most CFAs will struggle to pass the Regulation section of the CPA exam. On the other hand, most tax CPAs will probably find it difficult to review all the economics and finance concepts that they have studied in school long time ago.

However, I believe that if you are a quant person, CFA is probably easier than the CPA exam. 

In my judgment, CPA is harder and a more valuable cerificate for accountants.



__________________
Licensed CPA in Virginia
AUD - 90
FAR - 85
BEC - 83
REG - 86
AICPA Ethics - 95
Used Becker
Back to Top View CPA@23's Profile Search for other posts by CPA@23
 
archivator
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 29 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Posted: 29 Sep 2011 at 08:34 | IP Logged  

IMO a CPA is worthwhile in some situations. If you ever want to go corporate it can be a huge plus. From what I can gather, a CFA is fairly limited as to where it will benefit you. If you plan on being in IB/m&a for your entire career neither are extremely useful, but of the two I'd say the CPA can be a  little more helpful in your future.

Back to Top View archivator's Profile Search for other posts by archivator
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


<< Prev Page of 9
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1406 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote