Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: DRD and Deferred Taxes Issue (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
iheartpeter
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
Posted: 06 May 2010 at 18:49 | IP Logged  

So....I totally don't understand the issue with the dividends received deduction and deferred taxes.  I understand both concepts seperately, but I can't understand the issue with the part permanent difference and part temporary difference.  It's driving me crazy.  Can anyone help explain it in a simple way?? 

Thank you!!!! :)



__________________
BEC: 80 (May 2009)
AUD: 81 (August 2009)
REG: 90 (March 2010)
FAR: 80 (May 2010)

DONE!!

Carrie...On The Cheap
Back to Top View iheartpeter's Profile Search for other posts by iheartpeter
 
meghna
Regular
Regular


Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 162
Posted: 07 May 2010 at 13:31 | IP Logged  

Hi,

I am no genius but will try as best as i could.

Assume you(parent company) own 70% of outstanding c/s of subsidiary co and 30% of outstanding c/s of Investee company.

Addl data  :           ;       Investee co     Subsidiary Co.

Net income                   50,000              100,000

Div paid         &n bsp;         &n bsp;  20,000               60,000

Amount by which deferred taxes will increase DEPENDS ON YOUR EXPECTATIONS.Whether undistributed earnings of the Investee co. will be received via dividends in future or through SALE OF INVESTMENT.Now what is undistributed earnings?As from above it is difference btn NI and Div Paid of Investee co.  i e 30,000.So will this 30,000 in future will be apid thru dividends or future saleof investments.Also note,30,000 * 30% tax rate = 9,000.Original temp diff. uptill this point.(U will have 80% perm diff or 4800 from dividends received).

So uptill now u r expectation is that u will recieve 9,000 in future via dividends.Of that 80% will be deducted as Div.Recd.Deduction or 7,200.So u have to consider tax effects of 1,800(20%).Your def tax liab will increase by 612(1800 x 34% future tax rates).

Now say u  r expectations are that you will receive thru future sale of investment then temp diff is 9,000 and def tax liab = 9,000 * 34% = 3,060.

So in one case u r def tax liab = 612 and in 2ns case def tax liab = 3060.

Hope this much helps and then u can solve some qns and may be post here and some one can explain more from that point on...



__________________
Do it.
Back to Top View meghna's Profile Search for other posts by meghna
 
iheartpeter
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
Posted: 07 May 2010 at 13:38 | IP Logged  

Hi!

That helps me a lot!!

However, you lost me at how I will receive part of the net income through sale of investment??  I don't undersatnd that part.  How does that affect me as the investor?  You mean the Investee Co. will buy back my shares of C/S or they will issue more shares of C/S and I will buy more?  I just don't get that one part.  I know it is simple and I'm just missing something small....

The 3rd line from bottom is where I am lost.

Everything else you really cleared up for me!!! THANKS!!!



__________________
BEC: 80 (May 2009)
AUD: 81 (August 2009)
REG: 90 (March 2010)
FAR: 80 (May 2010)

DONE!!

Carrie...On The Cheap
Back to Top View iheartpeter's Profile Search for other posts by iheartpeter
 
HFAnderson
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 81
Posted: 07 May 2010 at 20:02 | IP Logged  

If you sold a portion of your equity investment at a gain you have to recognize it in that period. This would cause your Investment in X account to decrease from the difference between your total equity investment times the percentage sold and the FMV of considerations received. the difference would be a G/L.

It is much easier to understand if you go back and review equity investments in chapter 3 if your using becker.


__________________
B-75! 2/22/2010
F- Studying (4/29/2010)
A-
R-
Back to Top View HFAnderson's Profile Search for other posts by HFAnderson
 
meghna
Regular
Regular


Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 162
Posted: 08 May 2010 at 11:45 | IP Logged  

Hey Heartpeter and HFANDERSOn

SORRY not to get back to you on u r specific qn...I was trying to give u a example so u can be more clear but wiley book has example for only earnings distributed via dividends...

Now I hv a qn myself...WHy is NI on financial books and dividend received shown on tax books...is it because financial income has been earned by Investor/parent and u book it as u earn it abd dividend is actually received so u show in on u r tax return just like we use for Instalment a/c..This is so confusin...



__________________
Do it.
Back to Top View meghna's Profile Search for other posts by meghna
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote