Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: QUESTION OF THE DAY - MCQ’S ALL SECTIONS (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
AndrewCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 763
Posted: 25 Jan 2011 at 13:06 | IP Logged  

Correct Answer: D

Explanation: 
A firm's target or optimal capital structure is not consistent with maximum earnings per share. A firm's target or optimal capital structure minimizes the cost of capital, not the overall maximum earnings per share. A firm's target or optimal capital structure is not consistent with minimum cost of debt. A firm's target or optimal capital structure is concerned with minimizing the cost of debt and equity, not just debt. A firm's target or optimal capital structure is not consistent with minimum risk because the optimum capital structure minimizes cost, not risk.



__________________
Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
Back to Top View AndrewCPA's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewCPA Visit AndrewCPA's Homepage
 
AndrewCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 763
Posted: 25 Jan 2011 at 19:40 | IP Logged  

Today’s question: AUD

When there is a significant change in accounting principle, an auditor's report should refer to the lack of consistency in:

A)   The scope paragraph

B)   An explanatory paragraph between the second paragraph and the opinion paragraph

C)   The opinion paragraph

D)   An explanatory paragraph following the opinion paragraph



__________________
Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
Back to Top View AndrewCPA's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewCPA Visit AndrewCPA's Homepage
 
AndrewCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 763
Posted: 26 Jan 2011 at 13:18 | IP Logged  

Correct Answer: D

Explanation: 
When there has been a change in accounting principles or in the method of their application, the auditor should refer to the change in an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) which identifies the nature of the change and refers the reader to the note in the financial statements that discusses the change. The other paragraphs in the auditor's report are not affected.



__________________
Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
Back to Top View AndrewCPA's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewCPA Visit AndrewCPA's Homepage
 
AndrewCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 763
Posted: 26 Jan 2011 at 18:20 | IP Logged  

Today’s question: REG

On March 7, 2008, Wax Corp. contracted with Noll Wholesalers to supply Noll with specific electrical parts. Delivery was called for on June 3, 2008. On May 2, 2008, Wax notified Noll that it would not perform and that Noll should look elsewhere. Wax had received a larger and more lucrative contract on April 21, 2008, and its capacity was such that it could not fulfill both orders. The facts _________________

A) will prevent Wax from retracting its repudiation of the Noll contract.

B) are not sufficient to clearly establish an anticipatory repudiation.

C) will permit Noll to sue only after June 3, 2008, the latest performance date.

D) will permit Noll to sue immediately after May 2, 2008, even though the performance called for under the contract was not due until June 3, 2008.


__________________
Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
Back to Top View AndrewCPA's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewCPA Visit AndrewCPA's Homepage
 
AndrewCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 763
Posted: 27 Jan 2011 at 12:33 | IP Logged  

Correct Answer: D

Explanation: 
An anticipatory repudiation occurs when one side states they will not perform before the time of performance. The injured party can sue immediately or wait until the time of performance and then sue. Wax told Noll prior to the time of performance that Wax would not perform. Thus, Noll can sue immediately and need not wait until June 3. Wax may retract its repudiation as long as Noll hasn't canceled the contract or materially changed position.



__________________
Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
Back to Top View AndrewCPA's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewCPA Visit AndrewCPA's Homepage
 




<< Prev Page of 164 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1133 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote