Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: consolidated stockholders’ equity (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
chatterr
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 67
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 17:35 | IP Logged  

Wasilm,

You are right. On the date of consoldiation, Neel's Corp's equity would be $24 million. Right before the consolidation, Neel's Corp's equity is $16,000,00.

When Neel purchases Pym corporation, it makes the following Journal entry.

  Investment(Dr) 8,000,000
                        Common Stock(Cr)    4,000,000
                   Additional Paid In Capital(Cr) 4,000,000

Therefore, Neel's equity on 01/01/11 is 16 million + 8 million= 24 million

Siushan, ignore the 3rd paragraph on my initial post.


Back to Top View chatterr's Profile Search for other posts by chatterr
 
siushan
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 23:24 | IP Logged  

chatter / wasilm,

thanks so much for your detailed explanation. I'm confused about the concept of consolidation. Would you please help?

(1) on the date of consolidation, is Neel's investment in subsidiary an asset, not equity? Neel's equity remains to be $16m. In consolidated FS, Neel's investment in subsidiary is credited and Pym's common stock & APIC is debited. The consolidated equity is $8m.

(2) on Dec 31, 2011, if the equity method is used, Neel has investment in Pym $8.6m and equity in earning $0.6m,. Thus, Neel's equity is $18.2m ($16m + $2.5m + $0.6m - $0.9m). Pym's equity is $8.6m.
In the consolidated FS, Neel's investment in Pym will be offset with Pym's equity. Therefore, the consolidated equity is only Neel's equity, i.e. $18.2m.

Back to Top View siushan's Profile Search for other posts by siushan
 
wasilm
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 10 Apr 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 11:20 | IP Logged  

Consolidation takes place on a spreadsheet only unless push down accounting is implemented. The consolidation entries are never recorded in a G/L. So, if you are talking about parent's books then chatterr was right and the entry was correct. When you consolidate, you remove that entry ( on a spreadsheet only ) and replace it with the equity method entries. On that spreadsheet ONLY you will add parent's equitie and amount paid for the sub and earnings and subtract dividends.

1. On Neel's books the investment is an asset.

2. The investment account will increase by earnings and decrease by dividends and will show 7.7 mill (8 mill invested + 600k earnings - 900k dividends)

The consolidated numbers will be:

Stockholers' equity: $24mill

Earnings: $3.1mill

Retained earnings: -900k for dividends paid

But remember, the question is about consolidated numbers and not what Neel shows on its books.

But double check me...

 

 

  

Back to Top View wasilm's Profile Search for other posts by wasilm
 
siushan
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 12:57 | IP Logged  

In the consolidated spreadsheet, the investment in Pym is credited
and the Pym's equity is debited at the acquisition date.

At the year-end, the investment in subsidiary is 8.6m (as $9k dividend
is declared by Neel, not by Pym), which is credited. And Pym's equity
(8.6m) is debited.

Is this concept right? Is the consolidated equity mentioned in this
question same as the one calculated in the consolidation
spreadsheet?

By the way, why is the amount paid to sub added to parent's equity?
Back to Top View siushan's Profile Search for other posts by siushan
 
wasilm
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 10 Apr 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 13:36 | IP Logged  

The amount paid for the sub is theoretical sub's asset FV + goodwill if any. Paid, consideration given, asset FV with goodwill...is all the same.

There is no investment in sub account in consolidated FS. Sub's assets and goodwill will be included with parent's assets. Sub's assets are going to be reported at FV as opposed to parent's which are reported at cost. Refer to the formula in my first post. Parent's equity + consideration given ( amount paid or asset FV + goodwill) + earnings - dividends paid no matter by what company, that is what you see on consolidated FS which are computed on a separate spreasheet.

Did you read the chapter?  

Back to Top View wasilm's Profile Search for other posts by wasilm
 




<< Prev Page of 4 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1084 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote