Dear Alcohen,

I fully respect your opinion. However, I myself have done ACCA, MBA, CMA, CIA, CCSA, PMP, CISA and CFE.

CMA part 4 used to be a highly rigourous exam. The reason being it used to cover whole syllabus.

CMA has adopted a wrong strategy. It is now only targetting old experienced accountants who want to get some certification to add with their names. But the real market should be the new young students who should be convinced to choose CMA as a sole qualification to persue their career. Regretfully, no one now considers CMA as sole qualification. It can be a good combination if you are already a CPA or ACCA or CA.

As compared to this CIMA or CMA canada are sole qualifications.

Trust me, IMA is in a business battle since Jeff joined. The first step was to remove IFAC membership. 2nd to cut the parts to attract more customers.

My question to all who are happy with 2 parts is what if IMA makes it one part tomorrow? New qualifiers will still claim that it is still hard.Will youstill be  satiffied ????

Best regards