Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Exam Results, Scoring & Licensure
 CPAnet Forum : Exam Results, Scoring & Licensure
Subject Topic: Is the CPA exam grading curved? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
francois
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 26 May 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 16
Posted: 10 Dec 2010 at 02:16 | IP Logged  

Concerning the two theories earlier, both have flaws.

1. The "You have to have done better than 75% of the test takers to have passed" idea is flawed.  If it was true, then only 25% would pass each year, while the numbers are close to 45-50%

2. The "They must map your percentile to a percentage" idea also is flawed.  If that was so, then the percentiles that pass would be consistent year-to-year, yet this is not true.  Only around 35% were passing REG in 2004, while it is close to 50% lately.

I think maera had the best explanation.


__________________
AUD - 11/9 - 92
BEC - 11/12 - 90
FAR - 11/18 - Waiting
REG - 11/24 - Waiting
Back to Top View francois's Profile Search for other posts by francois
 
eyc10
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 30 Sep 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Posted: 17 Dec 2010 at 00:27 | IP Logged  

francois wrote:
Concerning the two theories earlier, both have flaws.

1. The "You have to have done better than 75% of the test takers to have passed" idea is flawed.  If it was true, then only 25% would pass each year, while the numbers are close to 45-50%

2. The "They must map your percentile to a percentage" idea also is flawed.  If that was so, then the percentiles that pass would be consistent year-to-year, yet this is not true.  Only around 35% were passing REG in 2004, while it is close to 50% lately.

I think maera had the best explanation.


I think AICPA can adjust certain standard.

Here is an example. In 2004, a teacher used to make 90-100 an A. You need to get A to pass and 35% people passed.

Then in 2010, the teacher made 85-100 an A. You still need to get A to pass and 50% of people passed.

Assuming pool per every window is of similar strength, we can say that the extra 15% of people passed due to extending the acceptable proficiency to 85. This seems to make sense or am I missing something here?

I think people automatically jump to the conclusion that, since the passing % is consistently 45-50%, it must be based on outperforming test takers in the same window. I don't think that's necessarily the case.


__________________
BEC 11/17/10 - 80
REG 5/11/11 - 76
FAR - Studying
Back to Top View eyc10's Profile Search for other posts by eyc10
 
Coastergenius
Regular
Regular


Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 191
Posted: 07 Mar 2011 at 13:07 | IP Logged  

I don't know why it's so hard for people to understand that despite the fact that you can bomb certain parts of the exam and still get a favorable score, it does not necessarily mean that the scores are curved. All that it means is that the numbers do not represent percentage correct.  Think of the scores like Monopoly Money. All that they mean is that you did better than somebody who got a score lower than you, and that if you got a 75 or higher, you did well enough to pass, and if you got a 74 or lower, you need to go out and get a drink. 

The term "curving" is pretty much slang out at this point anyway.  A true curve would mean that with any given class, 30% of the people get C's, 25% get B's, 25% get D's, 10% get A's, and 10% get F's. These days, "curving" is pretty much when professors give a class bonus points when the class doesn't do so well on a test.  Just be glad that most professors don't do a true "curve" anymore. These days, that would mean that pretty 65% of the class would get unfavorable grades no matter how hard people try. 
Back to Top View Coastergenius's Profile Search for other posts by Coastergenius
 
cpain180days
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 22
Posted: 14 Jun 2011 at 16:53 | IP Logged  

Waiting for my last 2 parts. Good luck to all who are with me here!

__________________
11/13/2010 FAR 89
11/30/2010 BEC 85
4/1/2011   AUD 96
5/27/2011 REG 79
Arkansas
Bisk books only:FAR-2008,BEC-2010,AUDREG-2011
Back to Top View cpain180days's Profile Search for other posts by cpain180days
 
BEC-U-RAGED
Contributor
Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 57
Posted: 15 Jun 2011 at 09:07 | IP Logged  

Coastergenius:

I had a 74 in FAR too! It hurts..:((...how did u deal with it to get up 10 points? Am hoping I could manage the same this time round...waiting and waiting.....for FAR and REG and I will be done with this torture!


__________________
AUD - 83
BEC - 77
FAR - 76
REG - 76
TN NASBA
"Success comes before work only in the dictionary." Anonymous
Back to Top View BEC-U-RAGED's Profile Search for other posts by BEC-U-RAGED
 




<< Prev Page of 11 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1113 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote