Posted: 19 Sep 2010 at 19:42 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Round1 wrote:
CharliePapaAlfa wrote:
passfirsttime wrote:
1tryCPA wrote:
Scott5858,did you receive your score?Passfirsttime explained in many of his posts that he did written communications on both simulations, and did it well. It would be nice that he would change the signature not to excite false hopes in others.Sorry to put your hopes down, but I'm interested in your score. I don't think I passed FAR but would like to have some hope for the couple days until I get my actual score
|
|
|
70 + 10 = 85 = false hope?
You will do better than you expect on all exams except for bec (if you were prepared) don't worry
|
|
|
Did you do the research tabs? You seriously left the simulations blank? Didn't even fill them in randomly?
|
|
|
Passfirsttime, please, please, answer the last question :-). I think there are many interested in finding the answer to that question. So, is it true that you nailed MCQs (100%*70 = 70p), WC (100%*10=10p) and those 5 extra-points were just a 'curving' thing. Do you say that you left EVERY tab in those two sims absolutely empthy???
|
|
|
I have taken the Becker simulation and noticed that some cells do not have an answer. In other words, 0 could be inputed or it could be left blank in order to get credit.
I could be wrong, but I think it is possible to pass by getting 100% of the MC correct and getting the WC right, if there are enough cells on the simulations that do not require a number value.
__________________ BEC - 8/24/10 (77)
AUD - 05/28/11 (83)
REG - 11/30/10 (77)
FAR - 08/19/11 Waiting
California
EA
|