|
|
Topic: QUESTION OF THE DAY - MCQ’S ALL SECTIONS ( Topic Closed)
|
|
Author |
|
AndrewCPA Major Contributor
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 763
|
Posted: 05 Nov 2010 at 14:15 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: A donation of stock to the corporation causes no reduction of assets and therefore does not affect total stockholders' equity. Under the cost method, there would be only a memorandum entry in the treasury stock account. When reissued, the proceeds would be credited to APIC: Donated Capital. Under the par value method, Treasury Stock would be debited and APIC: Donated Capital would be credited for the par value. When reissued, proceeds in excess of par would be credited to APIC: Donated Capital.
__________________ Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
|
Back to Top |
|
|
AndrewCPA Major Contributor
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 763
|
Posted: 05 Nov 2010 at 18:14 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Today's question: BEC
At December 31, 2010, Zar Co. had a machine with an original cost of $84,000, accumulated depreciation of $60,000, and an estimated salvage value of zero. On December 31, 2010, Zar was considering the purchase of a new machine having a five-year life, costing $120,000, and having an estimated salvage value of $20,000 at the end of five years. In its decision concerning the possible purchase of the new machine, how much should Zar consider as sunk cost at December 31, 2010?
A) $120,000
B) $100,000
C) $24,000
D) $4,000
__________________ Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
|
Back to Top |
|
|
tagee Newbie
Joined: 26 Jul 2010 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 10
|
Posted: 05 Nov 2010 at 18:33 | IP Logged
|
|
|
c
__________________ REG 7/21/10 65
BEC 8/30/10 66 ;11/29/10 62
FAR ?
AUD ?
|
Back to Top |
|
|
divyagovil1 Major Contributor
Joined: 30 Jan 2009 Location: India
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1456
|
Posted: 08 Nov 2010 at 05:45 | IP Logged
|
|
|
AndrewCPA wrote:
Today's question: BEC
At December 31, 2010, Zar Co. had a machine with an original cost of $84,000, accumulated depreciation of $60,000, and an estimated salvage value of zero. On December 31, 2010, Zar was considering the purchase of a new machine having a five-year life, costing $120,000, and having an estimated salvage value of $20,000 at the end of five years. In its decision concerning the possible purchase of the new machine, how much should Zar consider as sunk cost at December 31, 2010?
A) $120,000
B) $100,000
C) $24,000
D) $4,000
|
|
|
Answer C) $24,000. However, the book value of the present machine, however, is a sunk cost and is irrelevant in decision to buy the new machine.
__________________ Divya - CO State
Passed using Becker Review :
FAR - 04/11/09 - 94
BEC - 05/30/09 - 86
REG - 08/29/09 - 95
AUD - 11/21/09 - 92
Ethics - 2011
|
Back to Top |
|
|
AndrewCPA Major Contributor
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 763
|
Posted: 08 Nov 2010 at 17:01 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: A "sunk cost" is a cost which has been incurred and will not be changed by any future decision; it is therefore irrelevant to a decision and excluded in its analysis. The original cost of an asset less its accumulated depreciation (book value) is a sunk cost for replacement decisions as the replacement would not affect these amounts.
__________________ Andrew Lee, CPA
Wiley and Kaplan discounts for CPAnet members
|
Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide
This page was generated in 0.1250 seconds.
|