Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Big 4 Talk
 CPAnet Forum : Big 4 Talk
Subject Topic: Is E&Y The New Arthur Andersen? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Donald11
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 481
Posted: 12 Mar 2010 at 18:42 | IP Logged  

Apparently E&Y helped Lehman Brothers hide their debt.  Very smilar to Arhtur Andersen and Enron.  Anyone think that E&Y will be indicted the same way AA was?  If the are, that would basically shut them down and everyone who works there will be unemployed, further complicating a recovery in the accounting job market.  Even a class action lawsuit by Lehman shareholders against E&Y could have strong implications for the company. 

"Ernst & Young is clearly in a dangerous place but it's unclear how complicit they might be," said Jack Ciesielski, publisher of the Analyst's Accounting Observer, an advisory service for security analysts.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/lehman-autopsy-throws-ernst -young-into-spotlight-2010-03-12?reflink=MW_news_stmp  

“Enron brought down Arthur Andersen,” Felix Salmon notes. “Will Lehman do the same for E&Y?”

http://www.businessinsider.com/will-ernst-and-young-survive- the-lehman-fiasco-2010-3 

Back to Top View Donald11's Profile Search for other posts by Donald11
 
allegro-cpa
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 28 Dec 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 635
Posted: 12 Mar 2010 at 19:52 | IP Logged  

Auditors are not fraud examiners and are not responsible for looking for something like this and telling on them, they are supposed to help the client.  First I don't even think that E&Y understood how MBS and all the structured bond securities worked like many others.

If they do get in trouble and go down,  Let PWC and E&Y go under for and fall like AA did.  That leaves the Big 2.  Deloitte and KPMG (which seem like the most clean of firms).  Then let Deloitte and KPMG merge in 10 years and we have only 1 large accounting firm.  Regional firms like Grant Thornton and BDO become bigger powerhouses and gain more clients.  Its a pattern, big 8, big 6, now big 4, and in the future big 2. 

The SEC is responsible for the nonsense that went on with Lehman.  Someone needs to audit the auditors.  Audit E&Y's financials and check their firm for fraud as well, hahaha

Greed is killing america.  We want to much, to fast.  We see one color. Green.
Back to Top View allegro-cpa's Profile Search for other posts by allegro-cpa
 
fla_examer85
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 30 May 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 661
Posted: 12 Mar 2010 at 20:05 | IP Logged  

Fed's wont do that again, look back at the AA case and see the courts later admitted they were way too harsh (too little too late).  Worst you'd see is a few heads roll.

Even if E&Y was no more, it wouldn't make all those people unemployed, all the offices would quickly be absorbed by other firms like with the AA offices.
Back to Top View fla_examer85's Profile Search for other posts by fla_examer85
 
Sec704b
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 37
Posted: 12 Mar 2010 at 23:05 | IP Logged  

I thnk the gov doesnt want anyone else unemployed...the big4 are safe at least for the forseeable future
Back to Top View Sec704b's Profile Search for other posts by Sec704b
 
Zeratul
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 987
Posted: 13 Mar 2010 at 07:17 | IP Logged  

A comparison between Ernst&Young and Arthur Anderson is a bit premature. Thus far, it would appear that E&Y merely knew about the questionable accounting practices and failed to either provide a qualified/adverse opinion or discuss the situation with management. Contrast this with the AA situation, which was infinitely more offensive due to the cozy relationship caused by the partners in crime (AA and Enron), with AA doing the consulting on accounting tricks, signing off on those tricks in audit, and even at one point shredding documents for Enron.
At best, the E&Y situation constitutes a bad audit. They could be in financial trouble due to contingent litigation, and depending on culpability the auditors involved might have some problems down the road, but I heavily doubt that the firm is going to be shut down (unless of course it goes bankrupt).
Back to Top View Zeratul's Profile Search for other posts by Zeratul
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0940 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote