Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
REG STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : REG STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Did anyone pass with just Becker? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
KarenT
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Posted: 12 Nov 2011 at 02:34 | IP Logged  

I passed all other 3 parts of the exam with only using Becker, but failed REG
once before. Did anyone pass this part with just using Becker material &
MCQ?

I'm taking the exam on the 15th. So nervous.


__________________
FAR 78
BEC 79
REG 11/15/11
AUD 82
Back to Top View KarenT's Profile Search for other posts by KarenT
 
sonalj
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 20
Posted: 12 Nov 2011 at 14:10 | IP Logged  

Please share your views about using Becker for REG... My exam is due on 23rd Nov and I am just using Becker review material to prepare myself.
Back to Top View sonalj's Profile Search for other posts by sonalj
 
sonalj
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 20
Posted: 12 Nov 2011 at 14:18 | IP Logged  

Also how much of the Ancillary material is important from Becker... especially Regulation 4 - Ethics and professional responsibilities, Federal tax procedures and legislative process.

Thanks and Good luck from your exam.
Back to Top View sonalj's Profile Search for other posts by sonalj
 
CPA2011
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 29 May 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 49
Posted: 13 Nov 2011 at 18:52 | IP Logged  

Becker overprepared me for the other three sections of the exam, but quite frankly failed me on Regulation. This time around, I'm looking for something else to compliment it. It might not be unwise to do the same thing. Certain topics on the exam didn't appear on Becker at all.

On the other hand, the test report showed I was stronger than other candidates on practically every single topic except simulations which it showed I was weaker. My suggestion would be don't blow it like I did twice already.



__________________
FAR 05/10   87
BEC 07/10   85
AUD 08/10   93
REG 10/10   64, 74, 84
Back to Top View CPA2011's Profile Search for other posts by CPA2011
 
WanabeACPA
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Posted: 13 Nov 2011 at 20:48 | IP Logged  

Can you remember any topics that were not covered in
Becker's materials?

__________________
AUD - 91
FAR - 82
BEC - 87
REG - 11/30
Back to Top View WanabeACPA's Profile Search for other posts by WanabeACPA
 




Page of 4 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote