Joined: 13 May 2010 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 141
Posted: 04 Apr 2011 at 12:15 | IP Logged
I have to agree, that COSO stuff threw me for a curve last
time - nowhere near covered that material as in depth as it
was covered on the exam. I'm using Yaeger which uses Wiley
materials. I will surely be supplementing.
I've seen others note to read up a lot on coso.org. So
thats what I'm doing this time.
Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Online Status: Offline Posts: 14
Posted: 05 Apr 2011 at 17:48 | IP Logged
wiley questions only cover the basics which was not tested
on the exam. THe questions that were asked on the exam was
not the ones covered by roger or wiley so I did bad.
Joined: 29 Dec 2010
Online Status: Offline Posts: 7
Posted: 08 Apr 2011 at 06:30 | IP Logged
Just took it last week. The calculations are easier than wiley or becker, but
it's not as many as last year's exam. If you know some basic accounting
concept, you'll be fine for written communication part.
Joined: 21 Feb 2011 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 59
Posted: 11 Apr 2011 at 13:30 | IP Logged
auditd0rk,
Pls write about your experience... What all parts were heavily tested? How hard were numerical questions? How was the written communication part? I have my exam this Friday and i am really worried. I have gone through the entire Becker's material but scoring in between 60's and 70's.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum