Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
BEC STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : BEC STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: NRV (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
cpagoal2009
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Posted: 15 Nov 2009 at 00:11 | IP Logged  

 why MSB sales value at split off is not calculated using $5 & further processing cost?




Sonimad Sawmill manufactures two lumber products from a joint milling process. The two products developed
are mine support braces (MSB) and unseasoned commercial building lumber (CBL). A standard production run
incurs joint costs of $300,000 and results in 60,000 units of MSB and 90,000 units of CBL. Each MSB sells for
$2 per unit, each CBL sells for $4 per unit.
Continuing with the previous data, assume the commercial building lumber is not marketable at split-off but must
be further planed and sized at a cost of $200,000 per production run. During this process, 10,000 units are
unavoidably lost; these spoiled units have no discernable value. The remaining units of commercial building
lumber are saleable at $10.00 per unit. The mine support braces, although saleable immediately at the split-off
point, are coated with a tar-like preservative that costs $100,000 per production run. The braces are then sold for
$5 each.
Using the net realizable value (NRV) basis, the completed cost assigned to each unit of commercial building
lumber would be:
a. $2.92
b. $5.625
c. $5.3125
d. Some amount other than those given above.

Explanation

Choice "b" is correct. $5.625.
RULE: If net realizable value cannot be deteriend at split-off, then additional costs added after the split-off point
(separable costs) must be subtracted from the final selling price to arrive at net realizable value. [Note: In this
question, this applies to CBL only, as MSB is saleable at $2 each at split-off.]

CBL sales value at split off
Units of CBL produced 90,000
Less: Spoilage (10,000)
Units available for sale 80,000
S
ales price at point of sale: 80,000 units x $10/unit = $ 800,000
Less: Processing cost to complete (200,000)
Sales value at split off $ 600,000

MSB sales value at split off
60,000 units produced x $2 per unit sales price = $120,000
(Note that the additional processing costs incurred to generate a higher selling price of $5 per unit are not
relevant to the sales value at split off.)

Allocation of joint costs to CBL:
CBL sales value at split off $600,000 (600/720 = approx. 83.3%)
MSB sales value at split off 120,000 (120/720 = approx. 16.7%)
Total sales value at split off $720,000 (100%)
$300,000 joint costs x 600/720 = $250,000

Cost per unit of CBL:
Allocation of joint cost $250,000
Additional processing costs 200,000
Total costs $450,000
Divided by saleable units ÷ 80,000

Cost per unit $ 5.625

Back to Top View cpagoal2009's Profile Search for other posts by cpagoal2009
 
bryris
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 624
Posted: 15 Nov 2009 at 10:16 | IP Logged  

With MSB, you'd be adding the processing costs twice. It says that they are salable @ $5 AFTER further processing. They are salable before processing at $2.

The question is about CBL, though. When I first did the problem, I got C. I totally see the logic of the answer, but fail to see why this is the only way to do this. Allocation by nature is an art, not a science. I don't see why they even give the $4 figure when the CBL is not salable until it hits $10 (after further processing).



__________________
REG - 97
FAR - 97
BEC - 90
AUD - 97
Back to Top View bryris's Profile Search for other posts by bryris Visit bryris's Homepage
 
letmebedone
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Posted: 25 Jun 2011 at 20:10 | IP Logged  

I agree with Byris. (I realize I am 1.5 years late on this post). But I also do not see why the $4 was given. I used it on my calculation and although I see the logic behind the answer it frustrates me because how will I know what figure to use? Thanks. 
Back to Top View letmebedone's Profile Search for other posts by letmebedone
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0859 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote