Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
CPA Candidates: Talk / Help / Tips
 CPAnet Forum : CPA Candidates: Talk / Help / Tips
Subject Topic: Another 71 on BEC (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
JD7612
Regular
Regular
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 122
Posted: 30 Mar 2011 at 22:31 | IP Logged  

Cornpop30 wrote:

I just got my score back and also got a 71 on BEC.  I used Yaeger to study, and thought the review material was good.  I was nervous going in, but actually felt pretty good coming out of it.  The exam was definitly hard, but I felt that I was prepared as I was going through it.  I didn't see anything that I just completely didn't know.  There were a handful that I marked for review.  I guess now I'll just wait and see how I did on each section.

I do have limited time to study, as a lot of candidates do.  I have a 5 month old and a new job, so my studying is pretty limited to nights and weekends.  It's also been almost 10 years since I was in school, so I've had to relearn how to study. 

  I would like to try and review and sit for this one again early in 2011.  Does Yaeger do any updates for those who did not pass?  My study material is from 2010, but I know there are big changes for 2011.  Do I need to buy all new study material?  

Cornpop30, I can totally relate to you! I felt that I did well on the test and I cried like a baby today when I found out I failed with a 71...bummer. I just got a new job and my work hours are ridiculous. I still think that Yaeger does a much better job than Becker so I will stick to using their material. I bet Cindy will give you a breakdown of the updated 2011 materials if you send her an e-mail. Goodluck to you!

 

Back to Top View JD7612's Profile Search for other posts by JD7612
 
CPA#1
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 439
Posted: 31 Mar 2011 at 09:57 | IP Logged  

oldog new trics wrote:
I passed FAR without touching either of the SIMS (totally stumped) with a 78.


Ok, something is not right here at all. In the old exam, the simulations were worth 30%. So the highest score you could have gotten was 70 if you didn't touch both simulations. I've heard of people passing and leaving one simulation blank, but BOTH????

Hmmmm.........
:/


__________________
FAR: 52,66,73,61,89
AUD: 47,87
BEC: 80
REG: 64,74,84

DONE!!!!!!!
Back to Top View CPA#1's Profile Search for other posts by CPA#1
 
oldog new trics
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 30 May 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 655
Posted: 31 Mar 2011 at 11:53 | IP Logged  

CPA#1 wrote:
oldog new trics wrote:
I passed FAR without touching either of the SIMS (totally stumped) with a 78.


Ok, something is not right here at all. In the old exam, the simulations were worth 30%. So the highest score you could have gotten was 70 if you didn't touch both simulations. I've heard of people passing and leaving one simulation blank, but BOTH????

Hmmmm.........
:/

In my mind, which can be a strange place at times, I break down the SIMS into:

1.  The tabs.  For me, this is the SIM.

2.  The 2 essay questions worth 10 points total.

3.  The 2 research questions worth 1 point total.

So if you rock on the MCQ (which I studied to do), and write 2 great essays, you have 80%. 

I did a lot of calculations on how I could have possibly passed that test when I got home that day.  I didn't see any way my scores was going to get to 75% because I really guessed through 1 SIM, the other I had no idea.  No one was more surprised than I was when the scores were released and I passed. 

That is when I knew there was a curve, although 'curve' seems to get people riled.  None the less, these tests are not scored in a normal manner.  People who took the same test version as me during that window must have blown it worse than I did is all I can attribute my 78% to.  The MCQ were rediculously  easy (which made me think I didn't do well on the first testlet, and more anxiety ensued), but it was really easy to ace the MCQs.  Then the SIMs slammed me to the ground. 

There were 3 far left questions on foreign currency F/S consolidations in the SIM that I answered that probably stumped everyone else.  That always helps the score.



__________________
Becker
Stick a fork in me, I'm done.
Back to Top View oldog new trics's Profile Search for other posts by oldog new trics
 
CPA#1
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 439
Posted: 31 Mar 2011 at 12:19 | IP Logged  

Oh, so you did attempt some parts of the simulations. You see, you worded your post saying you didn't touch them. So, it sounds like all you did with the 90 MCQs and that's it and you passed with a 78. I was like, what?? LOL!

__________________
FAR: 52,66,73,61,89
AUD: 47,87
BEC: 80
REG: 64,74,84

DONE!!!!!!!
Back to Top View CPA#1's Profile Search for other posts by CPA#1
 
oldog new trics
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 30 May 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 655
Posted: 31 Mar 2011 at 17:14 | IP Logged  

CPA#1 wrote:
Oh, so you did attempt some parts of the simulations. You see, you worded your post saying you didn't touch them. So, it sounds like all you did with the 90 MCQs and that's it and you passed with a 78. I was like, what?? LOL!

I see what you mean - I didn't touch the tabs, but always prepped and sweated over the 2 essays (10%) of the SIM.  I pretty much left 20% of the test on the table every time.

I learned after FAR (my first exam) that when I got to the SIMS, I tried to spend 10 minutes on 1 tab, then put zeros or T/F but not spend any time thinking about it, and move on to the essays.  Thats were I made up my points.  I don't know if I could pass the exams the way they are now.  

Now if other people did as well as I did on the MCQs, the points given per question drops and I could have failed - even if I got all of them correct.  I was just lucky my test version stumped enough people to let me perculate up above the 75% mark.

This is why I tell people not to loose hope after taking a test.  You never know - you might have passed.  I've read stranger things happening.  One guy got the best diagnostics I've ever seen on a test and he failed - got a 71 I think.  He was all over the this forum asking how could this happen.  The scoring is very complicated (curved).



__________________
Becker
Stick a fork in me, I'm done.
Back to Top View oldog new trics's Profile Search for other posts by oldog new trics
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


<< Prev Page of 10
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote