Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Marketable Security (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
mits07
Regular
Regular


Joined: 22 Jan 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Posted: 29 Jun 2010 at 18:02 | IP Logged  

The following information pertains to Smoke, Inc.'s investment in marketable equity securities:
•    On December 31, 1995, Smoke reclassified a security with a $70,000 cost and a $50,000 fair value from trading to available-for-sale.
•    An available-for-sale marketable equity security costing $75,000, written down to $30,000 in 1994, had a $60,000 fair value on December 31, 1995.  Smoke believes the recovery is permanent.

What is the net effect of the above items on Smoke's valuation allowance for available-for-sale marketable equity securities as of December 31, 1995?

Ans: 30,000 Decrease.

Can anyone please explain this to me? Thanks!
Back to Top View mits07's Profile Search for other posts by mits07
 
faisal_1891
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 04 May 2010
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 74
Posted: 29 Jun 2010 at 19:57 | IP Logged  

Here you go:

1). Reclassification from trading to AFS won't have any impact on AFS valuation allowance. As trading security was presumably revalued to FV (50,000) as of Dec.31,2005 before transfer to AFS. As per the transfer rules, FV of trading security (50,000) becomes the new value in AFS category and valuation allowance of AFS is not adjusted for any prior revaluations when it was a trading security. In other words, what happened, happened.

2). AFS valuation allowance for the second item was 45,000 (75K less 30K) at the start of 1995. At end of the year, market value moved from 30K to 60K so valuation allowance needs to be adjusted accordingly. Valuation allowance as at Dec.1995 should be 15,000 (75k less 60k). Going from opening balance of 45,000 to ending balance of 15,000 will result in a 30,000 decrease in valuation allowance which is the correct answer.



__________________
06 Apr. 2010 FAR 94
09 Apr. 2010 BEC 88
13 Apr. 2010 AUD 99
20 Apr. 2010 REG 99
Back to Top View faisal_1891's Profile Search for other posts by faisal_1891
 
Kookie
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 93
Posted: 24 Oct 2010 at 20:25 | IP Logged  

faisal_1891 wrote:

2). AFS valuation allowance for the second item was 45,000 (75K less 30K) at the start of 1995. At end of the year, market value moved from 30K to 60K so valuation allowance needs to be adjusted accordingly. Valuation allowance as at Dec.1995 should be 15,000 (75k less 60k). Going from opening balance of 45,000 to ending balance of 15,000 will result in a 30,000 decrease in valuation allowance which is the correct answer.

The bolded quote above is EXACTLY the information I needed to aid my comprehension for this problem! Whew! Thank you!!

What I had in my notes was:
UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS (Valuation Account):
YR. 1:  Loss 45
YR. 2:  GAIN 30
Total:  Loss 15 

So I was trying to figure out how the solution/number $30 came into play here????  But as mentioned if we take the Beginning balance (45) and subtract the ending Valuation balance (15)....this equals the $30!!  Thanks again for your explanation!!! :-)

ETA:  (to aid in using the search feature on this site...this is for problem  cpa-00527)



__________________
AUD 79, 80
BEC 77
REG 73, 67, 80
FAR 63, 71, 67, 70, 80
PRAISE GOD--I'M DONE!!! :-)
Back to Top View Kookie's Profile Search for other posts by Kookie
 
pgupta
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 25 Jan 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Posted: 25 Jan 2011 at 14:24 | IP Logged  

Hello,

I still have a problem comprehending the question. The question asks for the
net effect on the valuation allowance. My understanding about the question
is they want to know the ending balance of the valuation account as of Dec
31 Year 2 i.e. 15000 and not the adjustment made to the account...

Please let me know what am I missing here.

Thanks for your help!
Back to Top View pgupta's Profile Search for other posts by pgupta
 
minismom
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 27 May 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 42
Posted: 22 Feb 2011 at 00:38 | IP Logged  

they want the net effect, not the ending balance.......

 



__________________
how to clear exams while mommying an infant and a toddler!!
Back to Top View minismom's Profile Search for other posts by minismom
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote