Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
AUD STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : AUD STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: reporting (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
arushi_13
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1235
Posted: 06 Jul 2008 at 11:23 | IP Logged  

For which of the following events would an auditor issue a report that omits any reference to consistency?
a) A change in the method of accounting for inventories
b) A change in the useful life to calculate depreciation expense

Correct answer: b

I m unable to understand why a is the not the right answer.
In my opinion in the following 2 cases there need not be any reference to consistency.

1)if the 3 conditions a) change is to an acceptable principle b) The method of acctg for the change is acceptable and c) Management is justified in the change, are met

2) Change from FIFO/Weighted average to LIFO as in this case the accounting treatment will be prospective treatment.

Please advise.

Thanks.
Back to Top View arushi_13's Profile Search for other posts by arushi_13
 
bopcpa
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 22
Posted: 06 Jul 2008 at 12:17 | IP Logged  

Consistency is implicit in audit report.i.e. if the same set of GAAP are used prior years and current year, auditor does not have to mention this in his report(everythign o.k). But when accounting principle is changed from one acceptable GAAP to another acceptable GAAP(choice A) and the client is justified as to change(i.e. to present F.S more fairly), the auditor needs to modify his report for consistency. Choice B is not change in accounting principle, but is change in accounting estimate, therefor no consistency modification is required.  

hope this will work......................

Back to Top View bopcpa's Profile Search for other posts by bopcpa
 
arushi_13
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1235
Posted: 06 Jul 2008 at 14:19 | IP Logged  

Thanks a ton for your detailed reply bopcpa .
I really appreciate it.

Thanks again.
Back to Top View arushi_13's Profile Search for other posts by arushi_13
 
may09
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 97
Posted: 14 Mar 2009 at 15:31 | IP Logged  

Is answer B correct? Becker passmaster does say that the correct answer is B. However Becker text book clearly says that quote" although a change in depreciation method is accounted for as a change in estimate for financial purposes, for purposes of auditor's report, changes in depreciation method do require the addition of an explanatory paragraph."

Am I missing something here?

 



__________________
REG(11/12)-Rcvd(12/18)
FAR(02/24)-Rcvd(03/20)
AUD(04/04)-Rcvd(05/18)
BEC(05/30)-Rcvd(06/15)
Back to Top View may09's Profile Search for other posts by may09
 
dallascpa
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8
Posted: 15 Mar 2009 at 01:03 | IP Logged  

Answer B is not a change in method.  A change in method would be from sum of years to straight line.   It is a change in estimate.  An example is 10 year useful life to 8 years.

Back to Top View dallascpa's Profile Search for other posts by dallascpa
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote