Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Confusing!! (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Aiman
Regular
Regular


Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 10:18 | IP Logged  

While I was reading Becker’s textbook 2009 ed, I found a strange sentence.  I’m not sure if I understood it.  Could anyone explain it to me in plain English?

“The level in the fair value input that is significant to the fair value measurement falls is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement” chapter 1, page 46, the last sentence of B. HIERARCHY OF INPUTS

Thank you



__________________
AUD - 02/13/09: 84
REG - 05/22/09: 90
BEC - ??
FIN - 08/31/2009: 90
Back to Top View Aiman's Profile Search for other posts by Aiman
 
rchxenson
Regular
Regular


Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 151
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 10:39 | IP Logged  

well, I am not sure what the sentence is but I know that it refers to the level of inputs to determine the fair value, those are referred to al level I through III.

Those are -

Level I - observable markets

Level II - Similar assets (in observable markets)

Level III - No observable market

Thus, level I is a better determinant of Fair Value than Level III.

Back to Top View rchxenson's Profile Search for other posts by rchxenson
 
utesa
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 411
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 11:01 | IP Logged  

Add to Level I  "Identical" assets

__________________
FAR 69,64,69,71,75
AUD 83
REG 79
BEC April-11
Back to Top View utesa's Profile Search for other posts by utesa
 
Aiman
Regular
Regular


Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 18:32 | IP Logged  

it says "fair value measurement falls is determined by the lowest level input" why is it determined by the lowest level? I thought it is determined by the highest level.

__________________
AUD - 02/13/09: 84
REG - 05/22/09: 90
BEC - ??
FIN - 08/31/2009: 90
Back to Top View Aiman's Profile Search for other posts by Aiman
 
arsenal79
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 27 May 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 00:47 | IP Logged  

That is right Aiman. To determine the fair value level (i.e., in Level I, II or III) in which a particular security falls in, we would need to see the "lowest level of input which is significant to the fair value measurement." So let say when you value a security for which numerous inputs are used for valuation (which can be observable or non-observable). In such a case, in order to decide which level you are falling in, you see the significance of the lowest input to the overall valuation. So if you have a security for which the lowest level of a significant input necessary for valuation is a level III type input (company specific), then the security falls into level III valuation category.

I hope this clarifies your concern   
Back to Top View arsenal79's Profile Search for other posts by arsenal79
 




Page of 3 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote