Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Deferred Income Tax Liability - DRD (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
webcpa
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 14 May 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 20:52 | IP Logged  

I had this question in the Becker simulated final exam. I am confused about why the they took the DRD (20%) on the earnings AND the dividend? I thought it would just be taken on the dividend....Help.

On January 1, 1996, Pesto & Co. purchased 35% of the voting common stock of Surry Co. and appropriately accounted for the investment by the equity method.  During 1996, Surry reported earnings of $200,000 and paid dividends of $40,000.  Pesto's current enacted income tax rate is 28%.  In addition:

 

     The dividends received from Surry are eligible for the 80% dividends received deduction.

     The income tax rate enacted for future periods is 30%.

 

In Pesto's December 31, 1996, balance sheet the deferred income tax liability should be:

 

Choice 4 is correct.

 

                          EQUITY                                                                         COST

                                                                 Dividends                      $ 40,000

                         $ 200,000                           Earnings

                         x        35%                         Ownership                        x       35%

                            70,000                         Parent Reports                      14,000

                         x        20%                Dividend Rec. Deduct                x       20%

                                                         (100% - 80% = 20%)                           

                            14,000                        Taxable income                        2,800

                         x        30%                          Tax Rate                         x       30%

                         $    4,200                             $3,360 =                         $     840

                                                     Deferred income tax liability

 

Back to Top View webcpa's Profile Search for other posts by webcpa
 
cpayesican
Regular
Regular


Joined: 28 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 219
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 21:27 | IP Logged  

In its financial statements, Pesto would report $70000 as income(equity in earnings of Surry) however in its taxes, it would include $14000(share of dividend), the difference would be the undistributed dividends of $56000-this would be the temporary difference in future years however due to the 80% dividends received deduction-only 20% would be the temporary difference ie 20% of $56000=11200

Future taxable amount $11200 * future tax rate 30%=$3360(DTL)

Hope that helps!

BEC passed
FAR Jul 2
Back to Top View cpayesican's Profile Search for other posts by cpayesican
 
webcpa
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 14 May 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 22:05 | IP Logged  

I guess I am confused on why the $200,000 is being treated as dividends. I thought that for the financial statements, you would have dividend income of 14,000 (40,000*35%) and for taxes you would have dividend income $2,800 (40,000*35%*20%DRD).

OHHH...sorry. Just did the math and I get the same answer this way. (14,000-2800=11,200*30%=3,360) The way it was worded was confusing me I guess.

Back to Top View webcpa's Profile Search for other posts by webcpa
 
jlfeldes
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 57
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 08:18 | IP Logged  

I HATE THIS I MEAN THEY TEST THIS IN REG WHY DO THEY NEED TO TEST IN FAR

__________________
FAR 5/21/09
AUD 82
REG 93
BEC 77
Back to Top View jlfeldes's Profile Search for other posts by jlfeldes
 
utesa
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 411
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 16:23 | IP Logged  

jlfeldes, you should not hate this you should love it! with a 93 in REG this may be a pice of cake for you .  I admire peple that scores in the 90's in these exams. Specially REG and FAR.  What a blessing :)

__________________
FAR 69,64,69,71,75
AUD 83
REG 79
BEC April-11
Back to Top View utesa's Profile Search for other posts by utesa
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1406 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote