Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
BEC STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : BEC STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Price Variance Becker problem (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Crammer
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 19 Aug 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
Posted: 30 Aug 2009 at 16:06 | IP Logged  

Becker hw. problem: Central Winery manufactured 2 products, A&B. Estimated demand for Product A was 10,000 bottles and for product B was 30,000 bottles.  The estimated sales price per bottle for A was $6.00 and for B was $8.00.  Actual demand for product A was 8,000 bottles and for product B was 33,000 bottles.  The actual price per bottle for A was $6.20 & for B was $7.70.  What amount would be the total selling price variance for Central Winery?

Answer: b. $8,300 unfavorable

SPV = (Actual SP per unit - Budgeted SP per unit) x Actual units sold

SPV Product A = (6.20-6.00) x 8,000 = $1,600

SPV Product B = (7.70-8.00) x 33,000 = ($9,900)

Total SPV = ($8,300) Unfavorable.

HOWEVER; shouldn't we be using the "SAD" Standard less Actual to calc the difference? If that's the case it would equate to a Favorable variance??

Back to Top View Crammer's Profile Search for other posts by Crammer
 
Crammer
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 19 Aug 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
Posted: 30 Aug 2009 at 16:10 | IP Logged  

Maybe this has something to do with the fact that it's asking for the Selling price variance instead of just the Price Variance....but I'm not sure what's the difference in calculation?
Back to Top View Crammer's Profile Search for other posts by Crammer
 
kj_nyc
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1145
Posted: 30 Aug 2009 at 17:05 | IP Logged  

Not sure how you would get a favorable variance?  The variance is $1600 favorable for product A but $9900 unfavorable for product B, so net $8300 unfavorable
Back to Top View kj_nyc's Profile Search for other posts by kj_nyc Visit kj_nyc's Homepage
 
Crammer
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 19 Aug 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
Posted: 30 Aug 2009 at 17:30 | IP Logged  

Right, because they're taking the difference between the Actual less Budgeted.

But if we use "SAD" I thought it was Standard less Actual.

So - Product A: (6.00 -6.20) x 8,000 = ($1,600) U

Product B: (8.00-7.70) x 33,000 = 9,900 F

Net $8,300 F

Back to Top View Crammer's Profile Search for other posts by Crammer
 
kj_nyc
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1145
Posted: 30 Aug 2009 at 17:45 | IP Logged  

Ah, I think you're confusing this with cost variances.  This is asking for selling price variance.  A is favorable because actual selling price exceeded standard (unlike with costs, where it's unfavorable if actual cost exceeds standard cost).  Similarly, B is unfavorable because actual selling price was less than standard (unlike with costs, where it's favorable if actual cost is less than standard cost)
Back to Top View kj_nyc's Profile Search for other posts by kj_nyc Visit kj_nyc's Homepage
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote