Author |
|
VenoM Contributor
Joined: 16 Aug 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 59
|
Posted: 25 Dec 2009 at 08:01 | IP Logged
|
|
|
So what's the verdict on this game? I heard that currently Stalla change their approach to one comparable to Becker's CPA review with instructors like Peter Olinto? is that true?
|
Back to Top |
|
|
QuantJockMN Major Contributor
Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 252
|
Posted: 25 Dec 2009 at 16:45 | IP Logged
|
|
|
I've used both.
CFA Level 1 - Fail, then Pass with Schweser CFA Level 2 - Fail with Stalla.
Overall I like Schweser better. They attack the LOS well and leave you feeling as if you learned the material, not just gamed it for the exam.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
VenoM Contributor
Joined: 16 Aug 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 59
|
Posted: 26 Dec 2009 at 01:23 | IP Logged
|
|
|
^^ Yea it seems everybody going with Schweser, I have a friend who passed both of L1 and L2 and he's saying the same thing, but maybe it's me but i'd prefer studying on video lectures, so the question is schweser's video lectures still better than Stalla?
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Dawgie Major Contributor
Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Online Status: Offline Posts: 451
|
Posted: 26 Dec 2009 at 20:48 | IP Logged
|
|
|
I used both for Level 1, I like Schweser better. But Stalla videos, just like Beckers were obviously superior. Schweser for it's QBank and study guides. They were pretty similar though. I do think the QBank is superior than passmaster. You can easily pass with either one, just a function of how much time you spend on it.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
VenoM Contributor
Joined: 16 Aug 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 59
|
Posted: 27 Dec 2009 at 02:37 | IP Logged
|
|
|
^^ thanx Dawgie, I think I'm goin with Stalla afterall, I took L1 in 2007 with Schweser 2006 material, and failed, i guess reading books is not for me, i Tru this time with video lectures, maybe it's easier for me
|
Back to Top |
|
|