Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Detachable Warrants (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
njacct09
Regular
Regular


Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Posted: 07 May 2010 at 10:05 | IP Logged  

On December 30, 1992, Fort issued 1,000 of its 8%, 10-year, $1,000 face value bonds  with detachable warrants at par. Each Bond carried a detachable warrant for one share of Fort's common stock at a specified price of $25/share. Immediately after issuance, the market value of the bonds without the warrants was $1,080,000 and the market value of the warrants was $120,000. In it's December 31, 1992 Balance sheet, what should fox report as bonds payable

Answer = $900,000

Cash 1,000,000

Discount 100,000

         PIC-Warrants 100,000

         Bonds payable 1,000,000

-----------------------------

I don't see why the warrants are valued at 100,000 in this answer. I thought that warrants should be credited at their fair value, the 120,000. which would create a bond payable of $880,000

 

Thanks in advance!



__________________
Becker 2009 Study Materials

BEC 8/4/09 - 88
REG 10/18/09 - 92
AUD 1/6/2010 - 86
FAR 5/18/10 - 86
Back to Top View njacct09's Profile Search for other posts by njacct09
 
meghna
Regular
Regular


Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 162
Posted: 07 May 2010 at 10:27 | IP Logged  

hi,

there are 2 methods with detachable stk warrants.One is Market related value where market price of both bonds and  warrants are given like in u r question.

And other one is warrnats only method where only warrants market value is given.

So now with market value available for both bonds and warrants u have to allocate the proceeds according to their relative market ratio.

Bonds = 1,080,000 /1,080,000 + 120,000 = 90%

And then allocate 90% of cash proceeds to bonds (900,000) and 10% to warrants(100,000).

Hope this helps.

 



__________________
Do it.
Back to Top View meghna's Profile Search for other posts by meghna
 
njacct09
Regular
Regular


Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Posted: 07 May 2010 at 10:59 | IP Logged  

Thanks for the clarification meghna!



__________________
Becker 2009 Study Materials

BEC 8/4/09 - 88
REG 10/18/09 - 92
AUD 1/6/2010 - 86
FAR 5/18/10 - 86
Back to Top View njacct09's Profile Search for other posts by njacct09
 
iheartpeter
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
Posted: 07 May 2010 at 13:41 | IP Logged  

So basically, you assume to use Market Method when market value of both bond and warrant is given in the example??

 

Thanks!! :)



__________________
BEC: 80 (May 2009)
AUD: 81 (August 2009)
REG: 90 (March 2010)
FAR: 80 (May 2010)

DONE!!

Carrie...On The Cheap
Back to Top View iheartpeter's Profile Search for other posts by iheartpeter
 
iheartpeter
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
Posted: 07 May 2010 at 13:49 | IP Logged  

I think this is a good example of the warrants only method, am I right?

On 12/31/09, Moss Co. issued $1,000,000 of 11% bonds at 109.  Each $1,000 bond was issued with fifty detachable stock warrants, each of which entitled the bond holder to purchase one share of $5 par common stock for $25.  Immediately after issuance, the market value of each warrant was $4.  On 12/31/09, what amount should Moss record as discount or premium on issuance of bonds?

Answer is $110,000 discount.  Computed as:

1,000 bonds * 50 warrants = 50,000 total warrants

50,000 warrants * $4 market value = $200,000 market value warrants

$1,000,000 face bond * 1.09 cost = $1,090,000

$1,090,000 - $200,000 = $890,000 bond value

$1,000,000 - $890,000 = $110,000 discount

 

Sorry, I know no one asked for that, but it helped me to type it out. :)



__________________
BEC: 80 (May 2009)
AUD: 81 (August 2009)
REG: 90 (March 2010)
FAR: 80 (May 2010)

DONE!!

Carrie...On The Cheap
Back to Top View iheartpeter's Profile Search for other posts by iheartpeter
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1250 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote