Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Government accounting -Reconciliation (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
sunnydelite
Regular
Regular


Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 109
Posted: 07 Jul 2010 at 15:01 | IP Logged  

Hi,
Becker Final review government accounting question below;
The City of Richardson reported a change in fund balance
of $2,020,000 in its governmental funds Statement of
Revenue, expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance of the
year ended December 31, 2004 Additional Information:

1. Capital outlay expenditure amounted to $10,000,000 in
the modified accrual statement, General government fixed
assets amounted to $160,000,000 excluding land and had an
average life of 20 years

2.The modified accrual statement reported proceeds from
the sale of land in the amount of $1,000,000. the Land
had a basis of $800,000

3. Property taxes had been levied in the amount of
$20,000,000. It was estimated that 3% would be
uncollected, that $1,000,000 would be collected within 60
days of year-end, and that $400,000 would be collected
more than 60 days from year-end. The City had recognized
the maximum permitted under modified accrual accounting.
4.     $370,000 of property taxes had been deferred at
the end of the previous year and was recognized under
modified accrual as revenue in the current year.
5.     The modified accrual statement reflected debt
service expenditures in the amount of $1,000,000 for
interest and $1,500,000 for principal. No adjustment was
necessary for interest accruals at year-end.
6.     Compensated absences charges, on the full accrual
basis, amounted to $100,000 more than under the modified
accrual basis.


The change in net assets in the governmental column in
the government-wide Statement of Activities for the year
ended December 31, 2004 is
A) 4,602,000
B) 5,202,000
C) 3,832,000
D) 4,632,000

The correct answer is D.

I do not understand Becker's explanation about
information #2, why $800,000 need be subtracted, can
someone explain to me? thank you so much!!!
Back to Top View sunnydelite's Profile Search for other posts by sunnydelite
 
1tryCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 337
Posted: 08 Jul 2010 at 05:46 | IP Logged  

the governmental fund recorded 1,000,000 revenue ( increase in fund balance) for the proceeds of the land. GW should record only 200,000 gain on the sale. To get from fund revenue to GW revenue, 800,000 should be deducted from governmental fund revenues.

__________________
FAR - 07/09/10 - {95}
AUD - 10/02/10 - {96}
BEC - 11/29/10 - {92}
REG - 05/23/11 - {75 would be enough}90 unbelievable, and I AM DONE!!!
______________
Wiley book/Gleim CD/Gleim simulations
Back to Top View 1tryCPA's Profile Search for other posts by 1tryCPA
 
tetsuwangatomu
Regular
Regular


Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 133
Posted: 31 Oct 2010 at 04:57 | IP Logged  

Nice explanation. Thanks.

__________________
Work Harder, that's all.
Don't post copyrighted stuff that we don't own here.
Back to Top View tetsuwangatomu's Profile Search for other posts by tetsuwangatomu
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote