Posted: 28 Jul 2010 at 10:42 | IP Logged
|
|
|
The substantive tests would be the same as large audits (i.e. cash recons, search for unrecorded liabilities, fixed asset additions, etc.) The difference is, because you cannot rely on the controls of these companies, the ROSM must be placed at high. This will lead to larger sample sizes. The documentation would be an excel spreadsheet illustrating the sampled items you reviewed and a memo with a purpose, procedures, and conclusion.
I worked at KPMG for 4 years prior to joining the smaller firm where I am now. Small audits are actually easier (in my opinion) than larger ones because there is not as much activity and the accounting is not as complex. if you can audit a large company, you can audit a small one.
__________________ mbradfordk
|