Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
REG STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : REG STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Dividend received deduction (M-1??) (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
thesame2
Regular
Regular


Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 169
Posted: 24 Dec 2009 at 22:45 | IP Logged  

for corporations, we need to make adjust entries for the difference between GAAP rule and tax rules.

But I don't know whether we should make adjustment entries for Dividend received deduction (DRD). I just finished the becker simulation quesiton for Chapter 3 corporation. It seems there's no adjustment for DRD. But why?

because I understand, DVD 100/80/70% Exclusion only works in IRC tax rules, not GAAP rules, we need to adjust it. Why Becker didn't?



__________________
BEC-pass
REG-pass
FAR-in progress
Back to Top View thesame2's Profile Search for other posts by thesame2
 
kj_nyc
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1145
Posted: 24 Dec 2009 at 22:54 | IP Logged  

Yes, you need to adjust for the DRD as a permanent difference.  But I remember that some of the practice problems say to ignore the DRD.  Read the problem again and see if that is the case.

__________________
KJ, CPA licensed in New York
AUD - May 2009 - 99
FAR - July 2009 - 99
REG - Aug 2009 - 99
BEC - Oct 2009 - 93
License applied for Nov 2009, received Jan 2010
Back to Top View kj_nyc's Profile Search for other posts by kj_nyc Visit kj_nyc's Homepage
 
thesame2
Regular
Regular


Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 169
Posted: 24 Dec 2009 at 23:02 | IP Logged  

kj_nyc wrote:
Yes, you need to adjust for the DRD as a permanent difference.  But I remember that some of the practice problems say to ignore the DRD.  Read the problem again and see if that is the case.

I went back to check it. it didn't ssay "ignore the DRD" or something like that.

anyone help me with it? It's Becker question.

I also think we should make adjusment for the DRD. why becker simulation solution didn't?!



__________________
BEC-pass
REG-pass
FAR-in progress
Back to Top View thesame2's Profile Search for other posts by thesame2
 
Xalina
Regular
Regular


Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Posted: 25 Dec 2009 at 13:27 | IP Logged  

From what I know, M-1 shows taxable income before the DRD and NOL Carry forward deduction. i.e Line 28 of p.1.
You deduct DRD and NOL on page 1 of the 1120  and not on M-1.

__________________
Becker all the way!
FAR- 10/09/09-88
AUD- 11/24/09-91
REG- 01/22/2010- 94
BEC- 03/01/2010-90
I came, I saw, I calculated!
Back to Top View Xalina's Profile Search for other posts by Xalina
 
Xalina
Regular
Regular


Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Posted: 25 Dec 2009 at 13:29 | IP Logged  

also, if you are using Becker, refer to the sample M-1 that they have on Pg R3-25. They explain it in there....

__________________
Becker all the way!
FAR- 10/09/09-88
AUD- 11/24/09-91
REG- 01/22/2010- 94
BEC- 03/01/2010-90
I came, I saw, I calculated!
Back to Top View Xalina's Profile Search for other posts by Xalina
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote