Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
REG STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : REG STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Capital Loss (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
iStudy
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
Posted: 27 Oct 2011 at 21:17 | IP Logged  

Hello,

Can someone help me understand this?

Becker MC CPA-01844

Doris and Lydia are equal partners in the capital and profits of Agee & Nolan, but are otherwise unrelated. The following information pertains to 300 shares of Mast Corp. stock sold by Lydia to Agee & Nolan:

Year of purchase   Year 1

Year of Sale          Year 8

Basis (cost)           $9,000

Sales price (FMV)  $4,000

The amount of long-term capital loss that Lydia realized in Year 8 on the sale of this stock was:

a. $5,000

b. $3,000

c. $2,500

d. $0

ans: a

Sales price (FMV) $4,000

Basis (cost)         (9,000)  

Loss realized        (5,000)

 

I got the calculation but my question is, wouldn't you divide the realized loss in half so that each partner incurs half of the loss?

There must be something I'm missing.



__________________
FAR - 82 EXPIRED :(
AUD - 86
BEC - 76
REG - 74, 84

CA
Becker Review
Back to Top View iStudy's Profile Search for other posts by iStudy
 
musicamor04
Regular
Regular
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 155
Posted: 28 Oct 2011 at 12:17 | IP Logged  

I can see where you're coming from, but the question is asking what would Lydia (personally realize) on the sale of stock to the partnership. The partnership didn't suffer the loss because it acquired the stock from Lydia, therefore nothing, by way of loss/gain, would be allocated based on their partnership interest.

Hope this makes sense.

-Jacob



__________________
BEC - (65, 75, lost credit re-take May 30, 2012)
FAR - (42, 60, 64, 76)
AUD - (63, 87)
REG - (70, 58, 50 69, 70, 88--FINALLY!!)
Back to Top View musicamor04's Profile Search for other posts by musicamor04
 
iStudy
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
Posted: 28 Oct 2011 at 21:04 | IP Logged  

Thanks Jacob :)

It makes sense. I didn't notice that the stock was sold by Lydia so I got confused.



__________________
FAR - 82 EXPIRED :(
AUD - 86
BEC - 76
REG - 74, 84

CA
Becker Review
Back to Top View iStudy's Profile Search for other posts by iStudy
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1250 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote