Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
BEC STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : BEC STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: JIT (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
cpagoal2009
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Posted: 14 Nov 2009 at 21:47 | IP Logged  

can somebody explain me the following question in simple language.



Which changes in costs are most conducive to switching from a traditional inventory ordering system to a just-intime
ordering system?

Cost per         &am p;nb sp;         &am p;nb sp;      Inventory unit
purchase order         & amp; nbsp;          carrying costs
a. Increasing        &a mp;n bsp;         &a mp;n bsp;     Increasing
b. Decreasing        &a mp;n bsp;         &a mp;n bsp;    Increasing
c. Decreasing        &a mp;n bsp;         &a mp;n bsp;     Decreasing
d. Increasing        &a mp;n bsp;         &a mp;n bsp;      Decreasing
Explanation
Choice "b" is correct.
Back to Top View cpagoal2009's Profile Search for other posts by cpagoal2009
 
bryris
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 624
Posted: 14 Nov 2009 at 21:54 | IP Logged  

The formatting is fairly bad on this, tough to line everything up. However, here is what is happening:

A JIT system requires a company to place many more orders than a more traditional buffer reserve system. For example, if I needed one screw at a time to build a widget, I could theoretically set up a JIT system to deliver the next screw right into my hand as I need it. The side effect is LOTS of orders. Therefore, if ordering costs (cost per PO) is dropping, this side effect becomes less of a concern.

Conversely, if the price of holding screws in my warehouse is increasing for whatever reason, I would be tempted to keep as little inventory on hand as possible to reduce these storage costs. Therefore, the JIT system would become more attractive.

As the cost to warehouse drops, the less appealing JIT is. OTOH, if it costs $5 to order a screw (or multiple screws), I am going to most likely order more than a single screw per order up the point where storing the additional screws begins to increase my total costs.


__________________
REG - 97
FAR - 97
BEC - 90
AUD - 97
Back to Top View bryris's Profile Search for other posts by bryris Visit bryris's Homepage
 
cpagoal2009
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Posted: 14 Nov 2009 at 23:49 | IP Logged  

Thanks bryris.
Back to Top View cpagoal2009's Profile Search for other posts by cpagoal2009
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote