Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
BEC STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : BEC STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: ultra vires (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
joecjr
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 974
Posted: 26 Jun 2010 at 15:40 | IP Logged  

Golden Enterprises, Inc. entered into a contract with Hidalgo Corporation for the sale of its mineral holdings.  The transaction proved to be ultra vires.  Which of the following parties, for the reason stated, may properly assert the ultra vires doctrine?

 

A  Golden enterprises to avoid performance

B  A shareholder of Golden Enterprises to enjoin the sale.


C  Hidalgo Corporation to avoid performance.

D  Golden Enterprises to rescind the consummated sale.

 

The correct answer is B.  how de we know who the responsible party is for performance with the way it is worded?  Does it matter or just know that a shareholder can bring a derivative suit for these actions?



__________________
FAR [83] 1109 Yaeger
AUD [90] 0510 Roger CPA
BEC [76] 0810 Yaeger/Gleim
REG [80] 1110 Yaeger
Done 12/16/2010
1year & 4months

Philadelphia, PA
joey_cjr@yahoo.com
Back to Top View joecjr's Profile Search for other posts by joecjr
 
kcd1
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 71
Posted: 29 Jun 2010 at 01:32 | IP Logged  

Yep. Three things can happen because of ultra vires:

1) Shareholders or corp can sue officers.
2) Shareholder can get an injunction.
3) State can dissolve corp.

A, C, and D don't make any sense. And when the question starts out with a Corporation, assume that's the Corporation or reference they are after, unless otherwise stated in the question.
Back to Top View kcd1's Profile Search for other posts by kcd1
 
joecjr
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 974
Posted: 29 Jun 2010 at 10:53 | IP Logged  

thanks kcd1

__________________
FAR [83] 1109 Yaeger
AUD [90] 0510 Roger CPA
BEC [76] 0810 Yaeger/Gleim
REG [80] 1110 Yaeger
Done 12/16/2010
1year & 4months

Philadelphia, PA
joey_cjr@yahoo.com
Back to Top View joecjr's Profile Search for other posts by joecjr
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1100 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote