Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Bad Debts recognition (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
divyagovil1
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 26 Mar 2009 at 21:37 | IP Logged  

Shear, Inc. began operations in 1990. Included in Shear's 1990 financial statements were bad debt expenses of $1,400 and profit from an installment sale of $2,600. For tax purposes, the bad debts will be deducted and the profit from the installment sale will be recognized in 1992. The enacted tax rates are 30% in 1990 and 25% in 1992. Shear elected early application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. In its 1990 income statement, what amount should Shear report as deferred income tax expense?

a. 300

b. 360

c. 650

d. 780

How would you interpret this question if you read it for the first time?

Thanks!



__________________
Divya - CO State

Passed using Becker Review :
FAR - 04/11/09 - 94
BEC - 05/30/09 - 86
REG - 08/29/09 - 95
AUD - 11/21/09 - 92
Ethics - 2011
Back to Top View divyagovil1's Profile Search for other posts by divyagovil1 Visit divyagovil1's Homepage
 
Jams
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 547
Posted: 26 Mar 2009 at 22:19 | IP Logged  

the answer is A,
bad debt expense is a deferred asset so 1400*.25=350
installment sale is a deferred liability so 2600*.25=(650)
650-350=300.


__________________
jams

BEC-76
AUD-80
REG-84
FAR-81 !!!
Back to Top View Jams's Profile Search for other posts by Jams
 
divyagovil1
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 26 Mar 2009 at 22:28 | IP Logged  

Thanks, Jams ! This is the third time I did this question and three times wrong :(

Reason :- my foolishness of not reading that the bad debts are to be recognized in 1992 and not in 1990 in tax return....So, my foolishness is proved :(

Word of advice :- Be fresh.... don't sleep or too little night before exam... otherwise you would be attempting the questions wrongly like I am doing today during my final review.....



__________________
Divya - CO State

Passed using Becker Review :
FAR - 04/11/09 - 94
BEC - 05/30/09 - 86
REG - 08/29/09 - 95
AUD - 11/21/09 - 92
Ethics - 2011
Back to Top View divyagovil1's Profile Search for other posts by divyagovil1 Visit divyagovil1's Homepage
 
jrupa
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 444
Posted: 27 Mar 2009 at 01:59 | IP Logged  

jams

i din understand the answer and the question both ... can u pls explain me...

Back to Top View jrupa's Profile Search for other posts by jrupa
 
divyagovil1
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 27 Mar 2009 at 09:33 | IP Logged  

The question is talking about how much of the income reported in financial statements is to be reported in tax return as well. Any temporary differences b/w FS and Tax return would be shown and deferred tax liability or asset would be calculated there on!

"For tax purposes, the bad debts will be deducted and the profit from the installment sale will be recognized in 1992."

It means that company had deducted bad debts and added profit from the installment sale in 1990 financial statement income, however, both items can only be reported on tax return in 1992.

Thus, exclude these two items from the tax return and the tax is also deferred for both!

And, the answer is jams provided :

bad debt expense is a deferred asset so 1400*.25=350
installment sale is a deferred liability so 2600*.25=(650)
650-350=300.

Hope that helps ! BTW, how is your review going on?

 



__________________
Divya - CO State

Passed using Becker Review :
FAR - 04/11/09 - 94
BEC - 05/30/09 - 86
REG - 08/29/09 - 95
AUD - 11/21/09 - 92
Ethics - 2011
Back to Top View divyagovil1's Profile Search for other posts by divyagovil1 Visit divyagovil1's Homepage
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1406 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote