|
|
Topic: Treasury stock ( Topic Closed)
|
|
Author |
|
lilyc Newbie
Joined: 19 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline Posts: 3
|
Posted: 19 Sep 2009 at 22:45 | IP Logged
|
|
|
On 01/01/x1, B corp. began operation and issued 30,000 shares of $5 par common stock for $9/share. On 06/30, the company bought back 10,000 shares for $8/share. Then, on 09/15, the company resold 5000 shares for $12/share. What amount of total additional paid-in capital should B Corp. report on its 12/31/x1 balance sheet if B uses the par value method to account for its treasury stock?
A. $45,000 B. $120,000 C. $140,000 D. $165,000
The answer is D. But I think it should be $125,000. Anyone can help me on this?
|
Back to Top |
|
|
prettynpink Regular
Joined: 08 Feb 2009 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 112
|
Posted: 19 Sep 2009 at 23:56 | IP Logged
|
|
|
issuance |
|
|
|
dr |
cash |
270000 |
|
cr |
cs |
|
150000 |
|
apic |
|
120000 |
|
|
|
|
ts at par |
|
|
|
|
TS |
50000 |
|
|
apic |
40000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash |
|
80000 |
|
|
|
|
resold |
|
|
|
|
cash |
60000 |
|
|
ts |
|
25000 |
|
apic |
|
35000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
total apic |
|
115000 |
this is my answer..i cant figure out why it is d
|
Back to Top |
|
|
lovethepirk Major Contributor
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Online Status: Offline Posts: 295
|
Posted: 20 Sep 2009 at 01:22 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Pretty,
I think your ts debit of 40000 should have been 30000, shouldn't it?
That would get you to 125000
|
Back to Top |
|
|
bryris Major Contributor
Joined: 07 Dec 2008 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 624
|
Posted: 20 Sep 2009 at 09:43 | IP Logged
|
|
|
My thoughts:
Cash 270,000 CS par 150,000 APIC 120,000
CS par 50,000 APIC 40,000 Cash 80,000 APIC-TS 10,000
Cash 60,000 CS 25,000 APIC 35,000
Here are what I feel the entries are. If you add of the credits, they do equal 165,000. The problem is, we've debited the AIPC account. What they say should be the answer and the real answer are off by the amount of the original APIC attributed to the stock we purchased for the treasury.
Where did this question come from and what is the explanation?
__________________ REG - 97
FAR - 97
BEC - 90
AUD - 97
|
Back to Top |
|
|
lilyc Newbie
Joined: 19 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline Posts: 3
|
Posted: 21 Sep 2009 at 21:40 | IP Logged
|
|
|
it comes from Becker Final review. No explanation, just the entries.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
Sorry, you can NOT post a reply. This topic is closed.
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide
This page was generated in 0.1250 seconds.
|