Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: NFP- Contradicting Wiley questions (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
studyfreak
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 481
Posted: 01 Jan 2010 at 18:50 | IP Logged  

On December 31, 2008, Royal Haven, a voluntary health and welfare organization, received a pledge from a donor who stipulated that $1,000 would be given to the organization each year for the next 5 years, starting on December 31, 2008.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, Royal Haven should report, on its statement of activities,

A: Temporarily restricted revenues of $5,000.
B: $0 until the pledge is received.
C: Temporarily restricted revenues valued at present value of an ordinary annuity for 5 periods.
D: Temporarily restricted revenues valued at present value of an annuity due for 5 periods.

Answer is D.
 
Here's another similar question:
 

On December 31, 2008, Hope Haven, a voluntary health and welfare organization, received a pledge from a donor who stipulated that $1,000 would be given to the organization each year for the next 5 years, starting on December 31, 2008.  Present value factors at 6% for 5 periods are presented below.

Present value of an ordinary annuity for 5 periods at 6%

4.21236

Present value of an annuity due for 5 periods at 6%

4.46511

For the year ended December 31, 2008, Hope Haven should report, on its statement of activities,

Answers

A: Unrestricted revenues of $5,000.
B: Temporarily restricted revenues of $4,465.
C: Unrestricted revenues of $4,465.
D: Temporarily restricted revenues of $4,212.

 

The answer is D.

 

What's going on?  These questions seem to contradict each other.  Both questions have essentially the same set of facts, but the first tells you to use annuity due (as the first payment is on Dec 31, 08), but the second tells you to use ordinary annuity.  Do you think the second question is a typo, and they meant to say December 31, 2009?



__________________
REG - 91 - Gleim
FAR - 92 - Yaeger/Wiley
BEC - 83 - Yaeger/Wiley
AUD - 96 - Wiley/Gleim CD
Actively Licensed CPA - Michigan
Back to Top View studyfreak's Profile Search for other posts by studyfreak
 
Boise
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 403
Posted: 01 Jan 2010 at 19:36 | IP Logged  

I think it's a typo.  Is there a correction on Wiley's website?

__________________
FAR 11/23: 90
AUD: 1/5: 79
REG: 2/20: 91
BEC: 4/3: 82



Back to Top View Boise's Profile Search for other posts by Boise
 
cpa0123
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 761
Posted: 01 Jan 2010 at 22:49 | IP Logged  

I agree with you. It is either option C or a typo & should have been 12/31/2009 in the question. I remember seeing this question in Becker too. That had the right answer though!

__________________
FAR-11/21/09 [97]
REG-02/06/10 [95]
BEC-04/03/10 [85]
AUD-07/07/10 [93]
Colorado board
I am done!
Back to Top View cpa0123's Profile Search for other posts by cpa0123
 
lovethepirk
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Posted: 02 Jan 2010 at 14:44 | IP Logged  

There is no cut and dry answer in general, but for your specific questions they are annuity due.

Just use common sense on the agreement terms.  This aggreement was on Dec. 31st and the payment was on that same day....that equals an "annuity due".

If the agreement stipulated the first payment wasn't until a year from now....it would equal and "ordinary annuity"

:)  good question


__________________
FAR - Not enough acc hours
REG - ""
AUD - ""
BEC - ""

Using Wiley books and CPAnet!!!
Back to Top View lovethepirk's Profile Search for other posts by lovethepirk
 
CPA24
Regular
Regular


Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 179
Posted: 11 Jan 2010 at 15:38 | IP Logged  

I know that it is human error, but these review companies need to do a better job of proofreading and making sure that these answers match the questions and the information is correct.  Wiley has serveral mathematical and grammatical errors in its 2009 edition.
Back to Top View CPA24's Profile Search for other posts by CPA24
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1563 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote