Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Pension Questions Compared (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
iheartpeter
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
Posted: 05 May 2010 at 18:30 | IP Logged  

Question #1

Data:

unfunded PBO: $25,000

unrecognized prior service cost: $12,000

Net periodic pension cost: $8,000

In its 12/31/09 statemend of stockholders' equity, what amount should Hall report as accumulated other comprehensive income for pension liabilities before tax effects?

ANSWER is $17,000

--------------------

Question #2

Rose Corp., a publicly traded company, implemented a defined benefit pension plan for its employees on 01/02/08.  The following data are provided for 2009 and as of 12/31/09:

PBO: $400,000

ABO: $360,000

Plan Assets at FV: $362,000

Pension costs for 2009: $150,000

Pension contribution for 2009: $150,000

Assume that as of 01/01/09, Roses' pension plan was fully funded and there were no recorded pension assets or liabilities on the balance sheet.  Ignoring tax effects, which of the following entries would be needed to properly record the funding status of Rose's pension plan at 12/31/2009?

ANSWER IS :  a debit to other comprehensive income for $38,000

----------------------------

My question:  So in question #1, the pension cost for the year is included in the computation for the liability which ultimately affects the entry to OCI.  But in question #2, the cost for the year was not taken into consideration..... why?



__________________
BEC: 80 (May 2009)
AUD: 81 (August 2009)
REG: 90 (March 2010)
FAR: 80 (May 2010)

DONE!!

Carrie...On The Cheap
Back to Top View iheartpeter's Profile Search for other posts by iheartpeter
 
venchlu
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 587
Posted: 06 May 2010 at 11:38 | IP Logged  

This is what I think-

Q1- Because it has unfunded PBO $25,000 means you gotta show $25,000 accrused penstion liability on the B/S.

When the company came up with net periodic pension costs- the JE would be

Dr. Pension expense 8,000

Cr. Accrued pension liability 8,000

So we have to bring the pension liability up to $25000...we will have to do JE- so that the Accrued pension liability is up to $25,000.

Dr. OCI 17,000

Cr. Accrued pension liability 17,000

Q2- we don't have to consider pension costs of $150,000 becuase  the company incurred 150,000 pension costs and the company contributed $150,000 to the pension plan. JE-

Dr. Pension cost 150.000

Cr. Pension liability 150,000

DR. Pension liability 150,000

Cr. Cash 150,000

The only thing we have to consider is to have $38000 shown as pension liability on B/S..why? because the plan is underfunded by 12/31/09 -$38,000 (PBO 400,000-   plan assets at FV 362,000).

JE-

Dr. OCI 38000

Cr. Pension liability 38,000

Hope it helps...

 



__________________
REG 91
BEC 89
AUD 88
MA certified
FAR 94
Back to Top View venchlu's Profile Search for other posts by venchlu
 
hanhan2008
Regular
Regular


Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Posted: 09 May 2010 at 17:26 | IP Logged  

Here I have two questions:

I use the same rationale to the example on Becker 2009 F6-15.

in this example, the periodic benefit cost is $545K, and the company's contribution if $420k during 20X7. Also, the example gives the Funded Status as of 12/31/07 $(1346K), and Accumulated OCI (before tax) as of 12/31/20X7 $(1096K).

So, I can make JE as follows:

DR   Periodic pension cost   $125         &n bsp;        (125=545-420)
DR   Accumulated OCI        $ 1221
CR         &nbs p;   Pension benefit liability   $1346

Now, my question is accumulated OCI after the JE made is $1221, which is not equal the amount of $1096 given in the example. Why?

Also, why is the Expected benefit obligation - 20X8 ($250K) not used in the whole example?

Please help! Thanks!




__________________
It's amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credits.
Back to Top View hanhan2008's Profile Search for other posts by hanhan2008
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote