Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Mind Boggling...... (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
TechnicConcepts
Regular
Regular


Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 127
Posted: 09 Jul 2010 at 00:18 | IP Logged  

I have no idea on how to solve this problem; any help
would be much appreciated!

CPA-05456

Main, a pharmaceutical company, leased office space from
Ash. Main took possession and began to use the building
on July 1, 2000. Rent was due the first day of each
month. Monthly lease payments escalated over the 5-year
period of the lease as follows:
Period                                                             
Lease payment
July 1, 2000 - September 30, 2000 $0 - rent abatement
during move-in, construction
October 1, 2000 - June 30, 2001      17,500
July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002        19,000
July 1, 2002 - June 30, 2003        20,500
July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2004        23,000
July 1, 2004 - June 30, 2005        24,500
What amount would Main show as deferred rent expense at
December 31, 2003?
a. $50,658
b. $52,580
c. $68,575
d. $71,550


__________________
AUD: 5-3-10(82)
FAR: 8-3-10(77)
BEC: 10-5-10(79)
REG: 11-30-10(78)
God is Great!!!
Back to Top View TechnicConcepts's Profile Search for other posts by TechnicConcepts
 
CanadianCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 19 May 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 554
Posted: 09 Jul 2010 at 00:46 | IP Logged  

I have seen this one in Becker before, I would just pray you don't get one like this on your exam.  It is just ALOT of calculations, and if you make one mistake you are screwed.

Here is how I solved it:

(1) I wrote out all the dates of when the payments were to occur.

(2) Take the monthly rent multiply it by the amount of months in the period to get what you are ACTUALLY paying. (This is why it is important to write the dates out). Total of all monthly payments should be 1,201,500. Divide that by 12 to get your monthly rent expense of 20,025 because you have to evenly allocate the rent expense over the period, including the free months.

(3)  Now that you have your monthly rent expense of 20,025, multiply that by the number of months in each period.  Compare these totals of what the expense is, to what you actually paid.

So that being said....

Jul 1 2000 - Sept 30 2000 Actual Rent = 0 Rent Expense = 60,075

Deferred = 60,075

Oct 1 2000 - June 30 2001 Actual Rent = 157,500 Rent Expense = 180,225

Deferred = 22,725

Jul 1 2001 - June 30 2002 Actual Rent = 228,000 Rent Expense = 240,300

Deferred = 12,300

Jul 1 2002 - June 30 2003 Actual Rent = 246,000 Rent Expense = 240,300

Deferred = (5,700)

Jul 1 2003 - Dec 2003 Actual Rent = 276,000 Rent Expense = 240,300

Deferred = (35,700)/2 = (17,850) **Actual Rent and Rent Expense are for the year, then divide deferred by 2**

Add up all the deferred totals and BAMM, theres your answer.

Should be "D"

Doesn't help that they give you some crazy dates.  I would not want to see this on my exam.



__________________
REG - [89]07/02/10
FAR - [93]07/12/10
BEC - [88]08/06/10
AUD - [91]08/16/10
ETH - [98]08/17/10
CPA 10/18/11
Back to Top View CanadianCPA's Profile Search for other posts by CanadianCPA
 
TechnicConcepts
Regular
Regular


Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 127
Posted: 09 Jul 2010 at 01:28 | IP Logged  

Thanks a a lot! I'm so stupid, this problem is not bad at
all. The key thing that I was forgetting was to multiply
the lease payments with the corresponding lease periods.
Such a simple yet crucial step. Thanks alot for the help!

__________________
AUD: 5-3-10(82)
FAR: 8-3-10(77)
BEC: 10-5-10(79)
REG: 11-30-10(78)
God is Great!!!
Back to Top View TechnicConcepts's Profile Search for other posts by TechnicConcepts
 
CanadianCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 19 May 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 554
Posted: 09 Jul 2010 at 08:54 | IP Logged  

Yeah no problem.  Its definately not a technically challenging question, I would say that I wouldn't want to see this on my exam because its a time eater due to the set up and various calculations you have to do.

__________________
REG - [89]07/02/10
FAR - [93]07/12/10
BEC - [88]08/06/10
AUD - [91]08/16/10
ETH - [98]08/17/10
CPA 10/18/11
Back to Top View CanadianCPA's Profile Search for other posts by CanadianCPA
 
nita
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 31 May 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 79
Posted: 10 Jul 2010 at 00:07 | IP Logged  

CanadianCPA wrote:
Yeah no problem.  Its definately not a technically challenging question, I would say that I wouldn't want to see this on my exam because its a time eater due to the set up and various calculations you have to do.

Hey canadian cpa...

U have u r exams scheduled so close..I am sweating by looking at it..

Back to Top View nita's Profile Search for other posts by nita
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1250 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote