Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: combined fin statements (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
aimtobeacpa
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 10 Dec 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 657
Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 18:36 | IP Logged  

Nolan owns 100% of the capital stock of both Twill Corp. and Webb Corp.

Twill purchases merchandise inventory from Webb at 140% of Webb's cost. During 2004, merchandise that cost Webb $40,000 was sold to Twill. Twill sold all of this merchandise to unrelated customers for $81,200 during 2004. In preparing combined financial statements for 2004, Nolan's bookkeeper disregarded the common ownership of Twill and Webb.

By what amount was unadjusted revenue overstated in the combined income statement for 2004?

A.  $16,000
B.  $40,000
C.  $56,000

Since all the goods have been sold outside the consolidated entity income recognition is correct.

However, sales and cost of goods sold have been recorded at two different points. The sale from Webb to Twill and the sale outside. To the consolidated entity Webb's cost (the original cost to the consolidated entity) is what is needed for cost of goods sold and Twill's sales (what it was sold for outside the consolidated entity) is needed for sales.

This means that the sale from Webb to Twill and the cost of goods recorded by Twill need to be eliminated. Each of the these are $56,000 ($40,000 x 140%).

D.  $81,200

can someone explain the concept properly refering to this problem...i am getting confused...


__________________
BEC-74,82(lost credit),78
FAR-67,80
AUD-75
REG-68,72,79
Back to Top View aimtobeacpa's Profile Search for other posts by aimtobeacpa
 
CPASTONE
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 18:49 | IP Logged  

Since all the goods have been sold to outsiders. following entry would be passed to eliminate the effect of inter company sales.It will take care of inter company gain on the transaction which should be eliminated

Dr.Sale-Inter co. 51600
Cr. COGS 51600

This will eliminate any profit between the two inter company. The good thing is that it has been sold out outside so there is no inventory adjustment required to eliminate profit element.

I hope it helped.


__________________
CPASTONE
FAR- 7/30/10 -pass
Audit-05/26/10 -pass
Reg-05/21/10- pass
Bec-08/31/10-pass
Back to Top View CPASTONE's Profile Search for other posts by CPASTONE
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote