Posted: 28 Sep 2010 at 00:16 | IP Logged
|
|
|
I just got my FAR score back and got a 75. I am estatic, but I can't help but wonder how.
I did the Becker review program, but when I took the test I felt like half of it was on consolidations and non profit/gov accounting, my worst areas. Hell even on my Becker homework I was averaging 60% at best. A little better in leases and I/S but worse in Non Profit and Consolidations.
I really felt that I got maybe 50% of the MC correct on the exam and only did well on the Memos and research parts of the simulations. For the rest of the tabs I just randomly inserted the auto fill answers hoping to get lucky. Obvioulsy I did, or God himself came down and changed my grade before nasba got it.
I just don't get it because on Audit I scored a 79 and feel like I got nearly all the MC right and did roughly the same on the simulations. I am happy I passed but I was shocked how the grades came back. I was expecting a huge gap between my AUD and FAR score considering how I felt walking out of each exam.
I've heard a few different things about the scaling, mostly, " MC is the most important part." It just doesn't make sense to me. Anyone have any insight on this.
Is FAR scaled to the hilt and Audit not?
|