Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: CPA-00577 Completion of Service (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
GVen
Contributor
Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 71
Posted: 13 Apr 2011 at 23:39 | IP Logged  

hello from a new user, have a Becker's prob:

Dunne Co sells equpment svc contracts that cover a two year period. The sales price of each contract is $600. Dunne's experience is that, of the total dollars spend for repairs on service contracts, 40% is incurred evenly during the first contract year and 60% evenly during the 2nd contract year. Dunne sold 1,000 contracts evenly throughout the current year. In its Dec 31 B/S, what amount should Dunne report as deferred service contract revenue?

The answer is $480K - current year deferral of all $600K is reduced by a cryptic formula - take 40% of the 600K and multiply by .5 since this is the "average" throughout the year.

But hold on, say I! If I'm telling you about the B/S at the end of the year (12/31/x1, which you'll note is poorly identified in the question), we have already incurred approx 40% of the total service costs! I would think that the answer should be $360K?

Back to Top View GVen's Profile Search for other posts by GVen
 
TaxProfMom
Regular
Regular


Joined: 19 Mar 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Posted: 14 Apr 2011 at 13:58 | IP Logged  

I hated this question too. Because they sold the contracts evenly
throughout the year, the revenue must reflect that. There was another
question that asked about what would cause the deferred service contract
revenue to be different year over year if the sales did not change and the
repair costs did not change. The difference was if in one of the years, the
sales were at the start of the year, and in the second year, the sales were
more toward the end.

It's a running 24 month time allocation. So January sales will have the
costs spread out over the normal two years, but August sales will have the
costs spread out from August Yr 1 to July 31 Yr 3.

This is just one of those you should memorize :-)

__________________
FAR - (Becker) 4/11 83!
AUD - (Roger) 8/11 86!
BEC - (Roger) 11/11 87!
REG - (Roger) 2/17/12 84!
BA Econ '93, MBA '00, Kid1 '04, Kid2 '06, MSAT '09
Back to Top View TaxProfMom's Profile Search for other posts by TaxProfMom
 
GVen
Contributor
Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 71
Posted: 17 Apr 2011 at 07:55 | IP Logged  

Thanks for the response!

Does it matter that they don't tell me which year? in other words would you expect the same answer if the question was year 2 vs year 1, assuming they flat-load contracts? then i would have the 60% from year 1 plus the 40% from year 2, which i imagine would all be divided by 2 to be mathematically consistent? i might just have to build a deferral waterfall to prove this to myself...

I guess the message is assume an even spread from the year 1 ratios, and then divide by two to represent an average...thanks again

Back to Top View GVen's Profile Search for other posts by GVen
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote