Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Becker question Chpt. 4 - Bay Co. (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
leslie4real
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Location: Bermuda
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Posted: 05 May 2012 at 16:24 | IP Logged  

On January 1, 1989, Bay Co. acquired a land lease for a 21-year period with no option to renew. The lease required Bay to construct a building in lieu of rent. The building, completed on January 1, 1990, at a cost of $840,000, will be depreciated using the straight-line method. At the end of the lease, the building's estimated market value will be $420,000. What is the building's carrying amount in Bay's December 31, 1990, balance sheet?

Correct Answer: 798,000

My question is that in Chapter 5 leasehold improvements made i liew of rent is expensed (also confirmed by Wiley).  Why are they capitalizing this particular leasehold improvements.



__________________
AUD - 80
BEC - 80
REG - 65-62-82
FAR - May 18 2012
Back to Top View leslie4real's Profile Search for other posts by leslie4real
 
astone
Contributor
Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 91
Posted: 06 May 2012 at 11:47 | IP Logged  

The Becker book states 'The value of leasehold improvements should be capitalized and added to the property, plant and equipment section or the intangible assets section of the balance sheet".
Do you have an example of a problem where leasehold improvements are expensed?
Back to Top View astone's Profile Search for other posts by astone
 
leslie4real
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Location: Bermuda
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Posted: 06 May 2012 at 18:36 | IP Logged  

Hi thanks for the reply.  My issue is with the "In lieu of Rent" part.  Wiley and Intermediate accounting books state that Leasehold improvements in lieu of rent is expensed.  This is where i'm stocked, because Wiley also states that a leasehold improvement can extend to the construction of a new building. 

__________________
AUD - 80
BEC - 80
REG - 65-62-82
FAR - May 18 2012
Back to Top View leslie4real's Profile Search for other posts by leslie4real
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote