Posted: 30 Sep 2005 at 15:10 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hey Magneto,
I read the following in Bisk REG book Code of Professional ethics chapter-
Exhibit 3
Ethics ruling on use of CPA designation by a member not in Public Practice
A member not in public practice may use the CPA designation in connection with financial statements and correspondence of the member's employer and also use the designation with employment title on business cards. However the member should not imply he is independent of the employer or it would be considered violation of Rule 102.
Here, there is no mention of license. As per above, only membership (in AICPA) is required. For AICPA membership, you need a valid CPA certificate.
So, I interpret it this way - if you are able to get a CPA certificate and if you become a member of AICPA, then, you can use the CPA designation on letters, cards etc
Would love to hear your comments.
Thanks
__________________ laks
REG-80, BEC-86, AUD-87 FARE - 93 Whew!! Done finally!!!
|