Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
CPA Review Programs & Study Materials
 CPAnet Forum : CPA Review Programs & Study Materials
Subject Topic: Study Materials (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
ATC2009
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Posted: 04 Sep 2009 at 16:09 | IP Logged  

I havent seen many people talk about using Gleim study materials. Are Becker and Yaeger that much better? This is my first post, I have been reading for about a week now. Thanks to everyone for thier posts.

BEC 8.25.09

FAR 10.02.09

AUD ?

REG ?           ;           ;           ;           ;           ;           ;           ;           ;     

Back to Top View ATC2009's Profile Search for other posts by ATC2009
 
Jerry
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 326
Posted: 04 Sep 2009 at 22:38 | IP Logged  

ATC2009 wrote:

I havent seen many people talk about using Gleim study materials. Are Becker and Yaeger that much better? This is my first post, I have been reading for about a week now. Thanks to everyone for thier posts.

BEC 8.25.09

FAR 10.02.09

AUD ?

REG ?           ; ; ; ;           ; ; ; ;           ; ; ; ;           ; ; ; ;           ; ; ; ;           ; ; ; ;           ; ; ; ;           ; ; ; ;     

I do not learn from books.  I learn from a teacher and I use books as a reference, not as a substitute for a teacher.  I learned that lesson the hard way when I failed FAR on my first attrempt just using Gleim and an out-of-date Becker book.  I passed FAR last month using Yaeger.

Gleim is a powerful tool, especially their Test Prep.  Gleim is better than just Wiley for organizing multiple choice questions.  I just made a test of 317 multiple choice question on IT for the BEC exam.

 

I like Yaeger and Bob Monette (Bisk Hot Spots) because when they come to a multiple choice question, I stop the DVD and answer the question.  I then listen to the explanation of the answer.  Yaeger even goes to the blackboard to show you the solution.  I take notes if I missed the question.  I find this approach more efficient and effective than the Gleim non-teaching approach. 

 

Back to Top View Jerry's Profile Search for other posts by Jerry
 
bryris
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 624
Posted: 05 Sep 2009 at 00:03 | IP Logged  

On the other extreme is me:

I can count the number of times I've learned something from a teacher on 1 hand. I learn from books and find Gleim to be quite good. Occasionally, reading some extra material from a textbook is in order, but they do the job well.

My plan is to read the outline and do the book questions and solutions (whether I got it right or not). Then I do 2 quizzes on 20 question setting and if I score a 75 or higher on both (more quizzes if not), then I do the simulation in the book.

Then after all SUs are done, I'll spend about 2-3 weeks reviewing everything again. This method is akin to "keeping up" with a college class = the first run through, then studying hardcore for the actual exam = the second run through.

What Gleim might miss in substance, you can make up for in volume of MCQ. After you've answered 1,800 plus MCQ (some 2 or 3 times) and 42 simulations (20 in the book, 20 online, and 2 for the practice test), scoring above a 75 should be well within reach.

I used Gleim for my Reg test and did quite well. In the interest of full disclosure, I had just taken a corporate tax class the semester prior, which probably helped a bit. I do not have that luxury with FAR coming up, but so far my MCQ grades are satisfactory. This next score will probably be a better indication of what Gleim can provide from a "cold turkey" start. I haven't taken a financial accounting class in nearly 4 years, but its coming back quite nicely. With 1 month and 3 days to go, I am coming up on SU 17 out of 20 and am averaging above an 80 on the first run through, with a scheduled 3 weeks of full time review to seal the deal.




__________________
REG - 97
FAR - 97
BEC - 90
AUD - 97
Back to Top View bryris's Profile Search for other posts by bryris Visit bryris's Homepage
 
ATC2009
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Posted: 05 Sep 2009 at 13:14 | IP Logged  

I have used Gleim for BEC and I am using it now for FAR. I think I will see how my scores look before deciding on another study method. Thanks for both of your posts.
Back to Top View ATC2009's Profile Search for other posts by ATC2009
 
Jerry
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 326
Posted: 05 Sep 2009 at 15:24 | IP Logged  

ATC2009 wrote:
I have used Gleim for BEC and I am using it now for FAR. I think I will see how my scores look before deciding on another study method. Thanks for both of your posts.

Gleim is adequate for BEC.  However, I do not think that Gleim is adequate for FAR.  You have to understand the concepts in FAR.  There is very little memorization in FAR. 

Back to Top View Jerry's Profile Search for other posts by Jerry
 




Page of 4 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1387 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote