Posted: 16 Nov 2011 at 11:06 | IP Logged
|
|
|
i may be wrong but for the 1933 act section 11, one dont have to prove reliance but 34 act you need to prove reliance:
1933: Duty of care existed, Breached that duty, The breach was the cause of Harm/injury.
1934: Purchased securities based on Accountant's opinion, You were unaware of the mistatement before purchase, You relied(Reliance) on the audited statement to purchase, Scienter on part of the accountant.
|