Posted: 11 Jan 2012 at 11:22 | IP Logged
|
|
|
My 2 cents...
Option Item-1: Although the partner has an 80% interest (over 50% rule), I would not judge this to be a related party transaction since it sounds like the asset was sold to a 3rd Party (unrelated).
Option Item-2: I'll have to check my Corp Tax Textbook tonight, but I know for C-Corp formation, if the FMV at contribution is lower than Adjusted Basis, the C-Corp's basis is the FMV due to the built in loss. However, not sure if this applies to Partnerships because the general rule is that NBV carries over when forming a partnership. But, Becker says that any built-in Gain(Loss) contributed to a partner is allocated to the contributing partner. BUT, since the property subsequently appreciated in value and was sold at a gain, I would think the built in loss can no longer be recognized by the contributor since it was practically a wash. Now, the 4 Gain would be allocated 80% to the partner and the other 20% to the other partners.
__________________ FAR 05/29/2011 #82
AUD 08/31/2011 #86
REG 11/29/2011 #72
REG 01/17/2012 #89
BEC 02/29/2012 #75
Becker 2011
TEXAS
|