Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
BEC STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : BEC STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Net Realisable Value (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
nicky31
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Location: Cayman Islands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
Posted: 21 Aug 2007 at 03:12 | IP Logged  

Lane Co. produces main products Kul and Wu.  The process also yields by-product Zef.  Net realizable value of by-product Zef is subtracted from joint production cost of Kul and Wu.  The following information pertains to production in July 2003 at a joint cost of $54,000:

 

 

Product

 

Units produced

 

Market value

Additional cost

after split-off

  Kul

1,000

    1,000

$0

  Wu

1,500

    1,500

0

  Zef

500

      500

3,000

 

If Lane uses the net realizable value method for allocating joint cost, how much of the joint cost should be allocated to product Kul?

 Answer C is correct.  Net realizable value (NRV) is the predicted selling price in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion and disposal.  The joint cost of $54,000 is reduced by the NRV of the by-product ($4,000) to get the allocable joint cost ($50,000).  The computation is

 

 

Sales value at split-off

Weighting

Joint costs allocated

Kul

$40,000

$40,000/$75,000 x $50,000

$26,667

Wu

35,000

$35,000/$75,000 x $50,000

23,333

 

$75,000

 

$50,000

Therefore, $26,667 of the joint cost should be allocated to product Kul.

This question is from Wiley, can someone please tell me where they got the sales value at split off figures from?

Thanks



__________________
I thank God for carrying me through each day
Back to Top View nicky31's Profile Search for other posts by nicky31
 
redskinalum02
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 84
Posted: 24 Aug 2007 at 18:20 | IP Logged  

I don't think they gave you enough info.  Usually the Selling Price is given in this type of problem.  That way, you could take the SP*# units available for sale to allocate the Allocable Joint Costs (which are reduced by the value of the byproduct).

__________________
Ohio
Becker
BEC - 84 (8/30 Score: 9/21)
AUD - 89 (11/28 Score: 12/20)
REG - 88 ( 2/26/08 Score: 3/18)
FAR - 85 (5/30/08 Score: 6/20)
Back to Top View redskinalum02's Profile Search for other posts by redskinalum02
 
bnr1476
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Posted: 26 Aug 2007 at 15:11 | IP Logged  

I agree, the NRV shld hv been given for all three products.

Back to Top View bnr1476's Profile Search for other posts by bnr1476
 
Majolica
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 22 Mar 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 22
Posted: 21 Nov 2008 at 00:43 | IP Logged  

does market value mean market price in this question?

but the question gives you the wrong figures?

Back to Top View Majolica's Profile Search for other posts by Majolica
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote